Search for: "Just v. Chambers" Results 241 - 260 of 2,579
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Nadav Orian Peer, University of Colorado Law School, has posted Money Creation and Bank Clearing, which is forthcoming in the Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law.ICYMI:  Marcia Coyle on Justice Kagan’s reluctant duel with Justice Gorsuch on “law-chambers history” of habeas corpus in Brown v. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 7:07 am by Giles Peaker
In short, as Briggs LJ said, it requires the reviewing officer to apply a sharp focus, not just simply a formulaic answer. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm by SJM
There now follows the Chamber’s decision on the claim for just satisfaction. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm by SJM
There now follows the Chamber’s decision on the claim for just satisfaction. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:11 pm by Simon Gibbs
Other than appeals just to costs judge level, my opponents on costs appeals are invariably specialist costs counsel. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:44 am by Lyle Denniston
Analysis A spectator in the Supreme Court chamber Wednesday morning could well have understood that the Justices had just made a major new pronouncement on the constitutionality of placing religious monuments on government property. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 12:18 pm
" In addition to detailed coverage of the arguments, this article also notes that Cuellar's staff includes three permanent research attorneys: Richard Rochman (from Baxter's chambers), Victor Rodriguez (from Corrigan's chambers), and Aileen McGrath (former law clerk to SCOTUS Justice Breyer) -- and two annual clerks: Phil Brest and Emily Curran (a former law clerk for the 7th Cir.'s Diane Wood and USDJ Koh).Today's DJ also presents an appellate article… [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
 All of this, and more can be yours Judge Hardiman, if you just go to the Senate and refuse to answer any questions about overturning Roe v. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 8:05 am by Eric Goldman
The notice may be bogus, but it’s just not the right kind of bogus notice that triggers 512(f) protection. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm by J
Also - just briefly, readers should note that, from November 29, 2010, there are new procedural rules and a new (more expensive) fee regime for the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber). [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm by J
Also - just briefly, readers should note that, from November 29, 2010, there are new procedural rules and a new (more expensive) fee regime for the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber). [read post]