Search for: "Justice v. State Compensation Director" Results 241 - 260 of 673
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
One Justice dissented on the grounds that Bethel was not a death penalty case so the court should independently analyze the argument (410 P.3d 105). [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 9:05 am by Bridget Crawford
(directors’ duty to maximize share price in corporate takeover) Fiduciary Duties in Corporate Governance Meinhard v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  This event is closed to the public.Student Presenters:Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu) The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (lauren.feldman@jhu.edu) Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York's Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University (jgrisch@bu.edu) Banking, Law, and American Liberalism:… [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
”4:00 PM – 5:00 PMFinance Committee (Hancock Room)6:30 PM – 7:30 PMExecutive Committee (Hancock Room)7:00 PM – 8:30 PMOpening Reception (Arlington/Berkeley/Clarendon Room)7:30 PM – 10:00 PMBoard of Directors Meeting (Georgian Room)10:00 PM – 11:00 PMNight Cap (M.J. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 11:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
Umesh Pratapa In the following guest post, Umesh Pratapa takes a look at the state of liability insurance in India. [read post]
Twice, the Supreme Court has stated that it wishes to consider this question.The first occasion was in Marek v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 5:00 pm by Patricia Salkin
 Knick overruled the 34-year-old precedent in Williamson County requiring that federal takings claimants seek compensation in state court before being allowed to proceed in federal court. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Gilham v Ministry of Justice, heard 5-6 Jun 2019. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
., on Friday, July 5, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Controlling shareholders, Dual-class stock, ESG, Institutional Investors, Lyft, Shareholder voting, Uber Director Independence and Oversight Obligation in Marchand v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:13 am
   ______________[1] See District Court of Duesseldorf, judgement dated 19 January 2016, Case No. 4b O 49/14. [2] Huawei v ZTE, Court of Justice of the European Union, judgment dated 16 July 2015, Case No. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:54 am by MBettman
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor, Justices French, Fischer, and former Justice DeGenaro* * Justices French, Fischer, and DeGenaro would have accepted both propositions of law. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am by Jack Goldsmith
The analysis is lengthy, so I will state my main conclusions here: None of the critics defends the report’s actual reasoning, which is pretty obviously flawed. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am by CMS
Its President has to hold or have held high judicial office (the post is currently held by Lord Justice Singh), its [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm by INFORRM
Lord Carnwath traced the case law on “ouster” clauses back to Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission [1969] 2 AC 147, the widest reading of which was summarised by Lord Diplock in O’Reilly v Mackman [1983] 2 AC 279 as follows (emphasis added): “…if a tribunal whose jurisdiction was limited by statute or subordinate legislation mistook the law applicable to the facts as it had found them, it must have asked itself… [read post]