Search for: "KEEFE V US" Results 241 - 260 of 273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2012, 3:00 am by Steve Lombardi
The original link comes from a law firm’s blog that I read from time to time, Keefe, Campbell & Associates, LLC. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:21 am by Joe Mullin
In this episode, you’ll learn about: The prior art, or evidence, of earlier technology that EFF was able to present to courts to prove that the so-called “podcasting patent” was invalid How the landmark Alice v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The menacing by stalking statute, R.C. 2903.211(A)(2), reads: No person, through the use of any form of written communication or any electronic method of remotely transferring information … shall post a message or use any intentionally written or verbal graphic gesture with purpose to … violate division (A)(1) of this section. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
And to add a little humor factor, Lowering the Bar discusses Knights Templar v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
v=p4uhOJH7d6o&feature=youtu.be, and detailed, relevant guidance from Jason Wilson, reflecting his extensive law publishing experience and obvious expertise. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
The authors’ job is to make sense of the judicial reasoning and to unpick, for example, the madness of the majority theocratic US Supreme Court’s politicised and reactionary abominations, as in Roe v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 11:57 am by Michael Oykhman
Depravation does not rely on the Crown proving who the rightful owner of the motor vehicle is, only that the Crown proves that the accused in fact, did not have a possessory right or proprietary interest in the motor vehicle (see: O’Keefe v R, 2007 NLCA 58 (CanLII); and Regina v McDowell, 1970 CanLII 1072 (ONCA)). [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
The thrust of Rynearson’s posts was that the founder should be removed from his role as board member and de facto spokesperson for the Memorial because he used the lessons of the internment, and his role with the Memorial, to criticize Republican politicians (chiefly, President Trump) in many media articles or appearances related to the Memorial, but failed to criticize Democratic politicians. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
Supreme Court's decision in Medellin v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
Supreme Court's decision in Medellin v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by rainey Reitman
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]