Search for: "Kelo v. New London" Results 241 - 260 of 683
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
City of New London as an example where one side lost the battle, but might have secured the upper hand in the long run. [read post]
17 May 2014, 4:37 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 6:38 pm
The United States Supreme Court bypassed an opportunity to revisit its much publicized 2005 Kelo v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:00 am by JB
I recently spoke with Ilya Somin (George Mason Law School) about his new book, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 12:43 pm by David Snyder
It also claims that Trump stated his opinion regarding the Supreme Court case Kelo v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 12:53 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), it is the property owner’s burden to prove by "clear and palpable" evidence the asserted reason for taking property is "manifestly wrong. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Ilya Somin
City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain, my book about the Kelo case and its aftermath. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 5:27 pm
City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 7:38 am by David Snyder
’” The Commonwealth Court noted that the US Supreme Court in “Kelo v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 12:20 pm
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469, 478 (2005), a rule of general application, or is it limited to takings justified solely on economic development grounds? [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:56 pm by Ilya Somin
New London, which upheld the condemnation of property for transfer to private interests in order to promote “economic development. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:58 am by Ilya Somin
City of New London, among many other important property rights cases), The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, and the Cato Institute. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 3:07 pm by Ilya Somin
In 2005, the Supreme Court generated widespread outrage when it ruled in Kelo v. [read post]