Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 241 - 260
of 600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2020, 6:44 am
Vannoy — Part I, Overruling Apodaca (Kent Scheidegger, Crime & Consequences) SCOTUS scuttles several of POTUS’ post-election ploys (Daniel Cotter, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin) We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:54 am
Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences weighs in on the matter as well. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 4:30 am
Here’s a round-up of other Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Supreme Court’s liberals face a new era of conservative dominance (Joan Biskupic, CNN) SCOTUS Needs to Decide Law, Not Just Fix Errors (Alan Morrison, Bloomberg Law) The Supreme Court Is Colliding With a Less-Religious America (Ronald Brownstein, The Atlantic) Supreme Court to Determine Fate of Religious Schools (Kelly Shackelford, Newsweek) The Danger of Introducing New Factual Claims at the… [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:28 am
And at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger responds to concerns, expressed by Justice Kagan during her appearance at the university, about cameras in the Supreme Court with a counterproposal: “Have the arguments recorded by a single camera under the court. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 10:44 am
Media Bias Against the Death Penalty: Sacramento Bee editorialist Foon Rhee penned this column on the death penalty in California after communicating with CJLF Legal Director Kent Scheidegger yesterday. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger takes a lighter look at Missud v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 3:52 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger previews next week’s argument in White v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:32 am
Kent Scheidegger of the Crime and Consequences blog offers a close reading of the transcript in yesterday's second case, Wood v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 9:30 am
Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Sacramento, California, said that in 2015 the U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 8:08 am
Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation and an outspoken capital punishment supporter, said most of the costs of a death penalty case come from "exhaustive investigation" of the defendant's background and should be cut out. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 6:44 am
Kent Scheidegger, legal director and general counsel for the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, which favors capital punishment and opposes expansion of criminal rights, said he had hoped the court would explain its reasoning in its case-by-case review of the stay requests. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:33 am
In other coverage of and commentary on yesterday’s order list, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on yesterday’s denial of review in Woodward v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 1:25 pm
Indeed, the statute specifically states that "The presiding judge shall not name the judge who requests the Court of Inquiry to preside over the Court of Inquiry," a point made by Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
Berman at Sentencing Law and Policy, Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, and the Associated Press. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger looks at the summary decisions. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am
” Other reports come from Kent Scheidegger at C&C Blog and Jaclyn Belczyk at JURIST. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:59 pm
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger responds to what he describes as Emily Bazelon’s New York Times Magazine “hit piece” on Justice Alito (which James featured in Monday’s round-up). [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses Monday’s grant of review in Montgomery v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:43 am
Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences, Douglas Berman at Sentencing Law and Policy, and the Associated Press all have coverage of the decision. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:59 am
” And at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on the controversy over the naming of George Mason’s law school for Scalia. [read post]