Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 241 - 260
of 601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2011, 7:19 am
In this weekend’s coverage of the Court: Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences previews Davis v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:32 pm
Thanks to Kent Scheidegger (Crime and Consequences) for the pointer. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:42 am
Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses “dangerously sloppy language” in the Court’s opinion in Hurst v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:58 am
And at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger dubs November 5 “federalism day” at the Court and discusses the role of the states in that day’s cases: Bond v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:17 am
Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger reports on an opinion by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court holding that the Confrontation Clause rule established by the Supreme Court in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 6:30 am
Kent Scheidegger has some interesting discussion of the issues over at the Crime and Consequences blog.The post When Prosecutors "Take a Dive" — The Purported "Error" in the Glossip Case appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 10:44 am
Media Bias Against the Death Penalty: Sacramento Bee editorialist Foon Rhee penned this column on the death penalty in California after communicating with CJLF Legal Director Kent Scheidegger yesterday. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 9:30 am
Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Sacramento, California, said that in 2015 the U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:33 am
In other coverage of and commentary on yesterday’s order list, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on yesterday’s denial of review in Woodward v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:32 am
Kent Scheidegger of the Crime and Consequences blog offers a close reading of the transcript in yesterday's second case, Wood v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 1:25 pm
Indeed, the statute specifically states that "The presiding judge shall not name the judge who requests the Court of Inquiry to preside over the Court of Inquiry," a point made by Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger takes a lighter look at Missud v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 3:52 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger previews next week’s argument in White v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 6:44 am
Kent Scheidegger, legal director and general counsel for the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, which favors capital punishment and opposes expansion of criminal rights, said he had hoped the court would explain its reasoning in its case-by-case review of the stay requests. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 8:08 am
Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation and an outspoken capital punishment supporter, said most of the costs of a death penalty case come from "exhaustive investigation" of the defendant's background and should be cut out. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger looks at the summary decisions. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
Berman at Sentencing Law and Policy, Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, and the Associated Press. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
At the Crime and Consequences Blog, Kent Scheidegger discusses Tuesday’s oral argument in Cullen v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:59 pm
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger responds to what he describes as Emily Bazelon’s New York Times Magazine “hit piece” on Justice Alito (which James featured in Monday’s round-up). [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:43 am
Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences, Douglas Berman at Sentencing Law and Policy, and the Associated Press all have coverage of the decision. [read post]
