Search for: "Kevin B. Even" Results 241 - 260 of 848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2022, 4:08 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Shortly after he had secured the 2016 presidential nomination, I wrote a Dorf on Law column in which I expressed amazed disgust at Trump's refusal to offer even the most minimal "I'll do A, which will work in the following way to cause B" story. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 10:43 am by Francis Pileggi
CEO’s “boardroom coup” because he violated his fiduciary duty by using affirmative deception to regain his position and corporate control–even though he did nothing technically illegal in an “ambush” directors’ meeting, in Bäcker, et al. v.Palisades Growth Cap. [read post]
10 May 2010, 10:59 am by KC Johnson
Or, even, take this article in yesterday’s Daily News from Kevin Armstrong and Michael O’Keeffe. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Kevin Hickey, Consent, Refusal, and Fair Use Consent is irrelevant in black letter law, but consent and disapproval are not binary. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 5:45 pm
Affirmed.NFP criminal opinions today (11): Kevin Boese v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 5:47 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
  While $15,000 per month in child support seems like a small amount compared to the $100,000 a judge ordered Kevin Garnett to pay to cover both child and spousal support, the payments are still a tough pill to swallow, even for a celebrity. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:35 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  He claims that there is a written document memorializing the concessions to which Kevin McCarthy agreed in January, which allowed McCarthy to become the House Speaker. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 9:14 am by Susan Hennessey
Wheeler acknowledges three examples where non-Muslims were indicted on terrorism charges: MLK bomber Kevin Harpham, the Hutaree group, and the Occupy Cleveland case, US v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 9:53 pm
Samuel B. at [www.flickr.com]; license details there.) [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Benisek, “[n]o justices spoke up in favour of politicians warping district lines to entrench their own power,” “[b]ut it was uncertain, after more than two hours of oral arguments, whether a majority of the justices will decide that even ghastly gerrymanders violate America’s constitution. [read post]