Search for: "LANCASTER v STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 333
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:23 am
Sherwood v Town of Lancaster In this Article 78 case, the petitioner sought to appeal the Supreme Court ruling that he was ineligible to receive credit for unused vacation and sick leave accrued as of the date of his retirement. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:26 pm
Lancaster, 470 N.W.2d 351, 358 (Iowa 1991). [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 4:10 am
Claiming entitlement to payment for unused vacation and sick leave credit upon resignationSherwood v Town of Lancaster, 2010 NY Slip Op 06057, Decided on July 9, 2010, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentRichard J. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:54 pm
But I think probably what the court meant was a taking that the government does not truly to serve a public purpose, but instead more to give the property to another individual person, the kind of Calder v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:43 am
Lancaster, No. 09 CH 18611, 2009 WL 6521389 (Cir. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:52 am
Lancaster, 45 F.3d 780, 789 (3d Cir.1995) (quoting United Mine Workers v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
State, No. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
Lancaster v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 7:33 am
Celestino v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Duh. - ECJ ruling in Coty Prestige Lancaster Group GmbH v Simex Trading AG (IPKat) (Managing IP) Frisdranken/Red Bull dispute is referred to ECJ: Frisdranken Industrie Winters v Red Bull GmbH (Class 46) A serious reference or is somebody winding us up? [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:05 am
law, Articles 5 to 7 of Directive 89/104 effect a complete harmonisation of the rules relating to the rights conferred by a trade mark and accordingly define the rights of proprietors of trade marks in the Union.The question referred to the ECJ by the Oberlandesgericht Nürnberg in Coty Prestige Lancaster Group GmbH v Simex Trading AG was whether perfume testers, the packaging of which bears the information that the product is intended for advertising purposes and not for… [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
FACTUAL and PROCEDURAL HISTORY Miracle Star, owned and operated by Jeffrey and Staretta Moffatt, provides drug and alcohol treatment and rehabilitation services at a location in Lancaster, California. [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:15 am
In the case, Scottsdale Insurance Company v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:48 pm
Employee Job Loyalty Can Impact Your Business - Marylee Abrams of Abrams & Schmidt on the firm's Minnesota Labor & Employment Law Blog Employers Incur Risk if they Pursue Action Against an Employee for Off-Duty Web Comments - Texas lawyer Tom Crane on his San Antonio Employment Law Blog Justice Sotomayor Exercises Judicial Restraint In Shady Grove v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:41 am
Supreme Court W (Children), Re (Rev 1) [2010] UKSC 12 (03 March 2010) Lewis, R (on the application of) v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council & Anor (Rev 1) [2010] UKSC 11 (03 March 2010) Martin v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2010] UKSC 10 (03 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) R v W [2010] EWCA Crim 372 (02 March 2010) NW, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 404 (03 March 2010) Costello v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 371 (02 March 2010) Lancaster,… [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:12 pm
Leroy V, Inc. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 4:25 pm
You may read the opinion in State v. [read post]
