Search for: "LAW OFFICE OF DAVID A. BRANCH" Results 241 - 260 of 1,485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
That definition centers on majority rule, constitutional entrenchment, judicial independence, and the organization of office-holders and office-seekers into parties (p 12). [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 5:00 am by Bruce Ackerman
Judge Thomas Griffith presided, with Judges David Sentelle and Raymond Randolph, joining in a wide-ranging discussion of doctrine and cases that touched on many national security law problems. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
So the idea of President Obama pardoning Clinton while he still has the power is not entirely fanciful.Follow @prof_amar Vikram David Amar is the Iwan Foundation Professor of Law and the Dean at the University of Illinois College of Law. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 8:06 am by Robert D. Williams, Preston Lim
Although it remains unclear whether the decision to go after Meng was meaningfully coordinated across the executive branch, that decision must be viewed in the larger context of a forward-leaning U.S. law enforcement strategy that reflects a new tolerance for actions that could escalate tensions with China. [read post]
12 May 2021, 11:41 am by Matt Gluck
  ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast featuring Lawfare Editor-in-Chief Benjamin Wittes’s discussion with David Ignatius of the Washington Post and Jack Goldsmith, Lawfare co-founder and professor of law at Harvard Law school, about former Devin Nunes staffer and member of the Trump administration Kash Patel. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Historically, when challenging actions of Congress or the President (as opposed to state executive officials like prosecutors or civil enforcement officers), a plaintiff has a very high bar to surmount, and that remains the case today. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:13 pm by kwalters
There is no reason that the office needs to remain as part of the United States executive branch. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 6:46 am
Note: David was on the Stanford team that along with Howe & Russell filed an amicus brief in this case on behalf of Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law et al. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 1:28 am
Its apologists complacently reassure us that there's not a remedy for every constitutional wrongdoing, and that selective enforcement of the law is a sacred prerogative of the executive branch--especially when it's protecting itself. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In the Stone affair, for example, was the President weighing in because of detached, genuine assessment of fairness by the head of the executive branch? [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
One is that courts would be in the position of accusing co-equal branches of pretext and dishonesty (or at the very least unawareness of their own true motivation), and that can create friction between the branches. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm by Quinta Jurecic
David Albright, Robert G. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm by Quinta Jurecic
David Albright, Robert G. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:00 am by Harvard International Law Journal
by Harvard International Law Journal [This post is part of the Third Harvard International Law Journal/Opinio Juris Symposium.] [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 8:03 am by David
David Cassuto Here now, a few words about the Ringling Brothers case. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am by Ronald Collins
Lazarus is the Howard and Katherine Aibel Professor of Law at Harvard University, where he teaches environmental law, natural resources law, Supreme Court advocacy and torts. [read post]