Search for: "LI & S Co., Ltd"
Results 241 - 260
of 344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm
M/s. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
Fujitsu Ltd. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:30 pm
The right to sue in defamation has been extended to cover trading corporations (South Hetton Coal Co Ltd v North Eastern News Association Ltd. [1894] 1 QB 133), and trade unions (National Union of General and Municipal Workers v Gillian [1946] KB 81). [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:18 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:54 am
There are five choices: the press decide where the balance lies; the Courts decide where the balance lies; Parliament changes the law (which is then interpreted by the Courts) so a new law decide where the balance lies; the balance is established by a regulatory regime; or the person whose privacy is invaded makes the decision. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:47 am
Li. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am
In the second, main part, the author, who is a member of the Commission's Expert Group on the arbitration interface, provides a detailed account and evaluation of the new lis pendens-mechanism established by the Commission proposal in order to effectively prevent parallel proceedings in the arbitration context. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm
Ltd. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 10:02 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am
There might also be said to be some merit in making clear, as the Bill does, that the burden lies on the claimant to establish that the claim is not trivial. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:00 am
Delta Square Ltd. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 9:30 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:48 am
Turning to the second question Binnie J reviewed what was then the leading Canadian case on fundamental breach: Hunter Engineering Co. v Syncrude Canada Ltd. [1989] 1 SCR 426. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:48 am
Turning to the second question Binnie J reviewed what was then the leading Canadian case on fundamental breach: Hunter Engineering Co. v Syncrude Canada Ltd. [1989] 1 SCR 426. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 11:08 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 8:10 am
” In this statement of law lies the genesis of PILs of the future.Erusian Equipment & Chemicals Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:20 am
The Calcutta High Court held that the Small Causes Court was not a court of co-ordinate authority and hence the High Court could inquire into the legality of the Small Causes Court's order. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
This is my sixth Blawg Review (One co-hosted with Colin Samuels of Infamy or Praise). [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
M/s Amritlal Bhogilal and Co. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 7:43 am
’s opinion in Syncrude Canada Ltd.). [read post]
