Search for: "LIVINGSTON v LIVINGSTON"
Results 241 - 260
of 866
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
In Zarda v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 10:27 am
But that ticket does not always result in victory.The case is LaBoy v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 7:53 am
This case is dismissed because the plaintiff gave his consent.The case is Latner v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 11:38 am
Sometimes the inmate gets shafted, but the law is not on his side, so he loses the case.The case is Spavone v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 8:30 am
That theory can work in sexual harassment cases, but it can also work when professionals suffer a dramatic pay cut.The case is Scott v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
The Court of Appeals brings the habeas petition back, granting Martinez a rare exception to the blown-deadline rule.The case is Martinez v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 6:26 am
The issue is whether employee contracts committing parties to pay prevailing waves under a provision of the State Labor Law must specify what particular work the prevailing wages will be paid for.The case is Ramos v. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 7:33 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:12 am
The case is Zuckerman v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 6:23 am
Plaintiff's FMLA leave was approved on June 26 through her termination date.The case is Douyon v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
In the case of Livingston v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
In B.A.P. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 6:09 am
The case is Khan v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:31 am
The Court of Appeals (Katzmann, Hall and Livingston) says No Dice. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:39 am
Since the company is exempt, the employees are denied overtime.The case is Hill v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:05 am
In Belya v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 8:10 am
The Second Circuit says that he has to.The case is Gerstenbluth v. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 7:56 am
Another First Amendment retaliation case is dismissed as the Second Circuit finds that decisionmakers did not violate the First Amendment in "retaliating" against a public employee who complained about nepotism at the University of Connecticut.The case is Weinstein v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 5:06 pm
Ottawa Citizen and the 2006 House of Lord's decision, Jameel v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 10:04 am
Here is how the Court of Appeals (Parker, Livingston and Droney) sums it up:In District of Columbia v. [read post]
