Search for: "LUCAS v. LUCAS" Results 241 - 260 of 965
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Hartlage quote to a statute banning deliberate lies). [4] Lucas, 472 Mass. at 399; see also Rickert v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 7:20 am by Matthew Campbell
Worse still, in a nation where “all persons are created equal,” Matthews v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:25 am by Picl Guest Blogger
Table I: Bruce Lucas Compensation from Heritage Insurance, 2013-20202 Additionally, Lucas sold substantial initial Heritage shareholdings the year after the company’s IPO. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:18 am by traceydennis
Supreme Court JS (Sri Lanka), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 15 (17 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Maga v The Trustees of the Birmingham Archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church [2010] EWCA Civ 256 (16 March 2010) Agricullo Ltd v Yorkshire Housing Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 229 (16 March 2010) Joseph v Nettleton Road Housing Co-Operative Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 228 (16 March 2010) FN (Zimbabwe) v… [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 1:00 pm
” A few edited snippets from that exclusive interview follow:“V: What has helped forge your authenticity? [read post]
14 May 2010, 3:15 am by traceydennis
Supreme Court Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd, R (on the application of)v Wolverhampton City Council & Anor [2010] UKSC 20 (12 May 2010) ZN (Afghanistan) & Ors v Entry Clearance Officer (Karachi) [2010] UKSC 21 (12 May 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust v Roldan [2010] EWCA Civ 522 (13 May 2010) Moulton v Chief Constable of the West Midlands [2010] EWCA Civ 524 (13 May 2010) De Bruyne v De Bruyne & Ors… [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am by INFORRM
Cambridge v Makin, heard 8 to 12 November 2010 (Tugendhat J) Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 4:28 am
Lucas, federal employees are not permitted to bring Bivens constitutional tort claims directly to federal court to vindicate their First Amendment rights to free speech under Pickering v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 9:46 am by Viking
Lucas, cited two exemptions in stating that the [Article 32, UCMJ, hearing] report would not be released. [read post]