Search for: "LYNCH v. UNITED STATES" Results 241 - 260 of 850
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2017, 2:44 am by Nicandro Iannacci
(“You, the people of the United States, will not permit it to destroy you,” he said of the utility lobby in a public address. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am by Wolfgang Demino
 Plaintiff also seeks an additional $2,500 for post-judgment motions, $5,000 for an appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, and $2,500 for an appeal to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 2:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
True threats, as the United States Supreme Court defines them, are “those statements where the speaker means to communicate a serious expression of an intent to commit an act of unlawful violence to a particular individual or group of individuals. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:20 am by karen
For the brief: https://www.eff.org/document/rios-v-united-states-eff-brief Tags: Locational PrivacyContact:  AndrewCrockerStaff Attorneyandrew@eff.org [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
—Humberto Morales Moreno, Universidad Autonoma de Puebla  Author Meets Reader: Carol Steiker & Jordan Steiker, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital PunishmentTue, 6/20: 12:45 PM  - 2:30 PM – Sheraton Maria Isabel Imperio C (2nd Floor) ·         Authors—Carol Steiker, Harvard Law School and Jordan Steiker, University of Texas School of Law   ·        … [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for historical records showing where a cell phone connects with towers. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:42 am by Quinta Jurecic
Trump notably failed to reaffirm the United States’ commitment to NATO’s Article 5, promising mutual defense among allies, and instead castigated his fellow leaders for failing to adequately fund the alliance, suggesting incorrectly that the United States is owed money. [read post]
11 May 2017, 2:30 am by Jon Katz
Carrico blundered in penning the Virginia Supreme Court opinion declining to overturn the law criminalizing interracial marriage, only to have the United States Supreme Court unanimously reverse him. [read post]