Search for: "LaBelle v. LaBelle" Results 241 - 260 of 12,213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2009, 12:26 pm
On December 15, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Altria Group, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 9:07 pm by Patent Docs
§ 355(j)(2)(A)(viii) (the so-called "skinny label) has in the recent past raised something of a kerfuffle before the Federal Circuit (see "GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 10:02 pm by Lauren Handel
Supreme Court in Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corp. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
Hear expert commentary from Tom Irving and Michelle O’Brien of the Marbury Law Group on the risk generic drug companies face when utilizing a skinny label in the aftermath of the Federal Circuit’s decision in Glaxosmithkline LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 6:50 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) Last month, in International Dairy Foods Association v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 1:35 pm by Tom Lamb
If the F.D.A. agrees that the label change is necessary, the generic manufacturers of the drug must also change their labels. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 7:46 am by lcampbell@lawbc.com
“Product label claims generally considered ‘non-pesticidal’ (i.e. non-plant regulator claims),” including:  “plant nutrition-based claims” (Table 1a); “plant inoculant-based claims” (Table 1b); and “soil amendment-based claims” (Table 1c): “Generic product label claims for products not covered by the exclusions in the FIFRA Section 2(v) definition of a plant regulator,” including “examples… [read post]
Bonta: Ninth Circuit Holds that Prop 65 Warning Labels for Disputed Carcinogens Violate the First Amendment Only a few weeks after the district court’s decision in CalChamber v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 3:51 am
Oral argument in the big preemption case of the Supreme Court Term, Wyeth v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 11:08 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Evidence Other acts Where a defendant is charged with using a communication facility in the commission of a controlled substance, other mailing labels are admissible to show intent. [read post]