Search for: "Label v Label" Results 241 - 260 of 13,215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2009, 2:31 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] ruled [opinion, PDF] 6-3 Wednesday in Wyeth v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:50 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments Monday in three cases, including Altria Group v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 12:41 am by Ben Vernia
(The off-label use at issue in the case is the treatment of spasmodic dysphonia; although Botox is most widely known for cosmetic uses, it is on-label for treating certain conditions associated with cervical dystonia, severe primary axillary hyperhidrosis, and strabismus and blepharospasm associated with dystonia.) [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 5:14 am
Epogen & Aranesp Off-Label Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation, 2008 WL 5335062, at *7 (C.D. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 12:26 pm
On December 15, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Altria Group, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 9:07 pm by Patent Docs
§ 355(j)(2)(A)(viii) (the so-called "skinny label) has in the recent past raised something of a kerfuffle before the Federal Circuit (see "GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 10:02 pm by Lauren Handel
Supreme Court in Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corp. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
Hear expert commentary from Tom Irving and Michelle O’Brien of the Marbury Law Group on the risk generic drug companies face when utilizing a skinny label in the aftermath of the Federal Circuit’s decision in Glaxosmithkline LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 6:50 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) Last month, in International Dairy Foods Association v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 7:46 am by lcampbell@lawbc.com
“Product label claims generally considered ‘non-pesticidal’ (i.e. non-plant regulator claims),” including:  “plant nutrition-based claims” (Table 1a); “plant inoculant-based claims” (Table 1b); and “soil amendment-based claims” (Table 1c): “Generic product label claims for products not covered by the exclusions in the FIFRA Section 2(v) definition of a plant regulator,” including “examples… [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 1:35 pm by Tom Lamb
If the F.D.A. agrees that the label change is necessary, the generic manufacturers of the drug must also change their labels. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 3:51 am
Oral argument in the big preemption case of the Supreme Court Term, Wyeth v. [read post]