Search for: "Lacks v. Commissioner of Correction" Results 241 - 260 of 446
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Lack of Independence—Conflict of Interest The most obvious objection to the current review process in Canada is the lack of institutional independence on the part of the body responsible for determining applications for review. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 8:55 am
  In so doing, the Tribunal made the same error of law that this court corrected in the case of 3437400 Canada Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
 Another thread that ran through to the close of the year was the harmonisation of copyright in the European Union: The European Copyright Society (ECS) said in a letter to the European Commission's digital commissioner Günther Oettinger, that the "actual Union-wide unification of copyright", as opposed to simply further harmonising the existing EU copyright regime, would have "several major advantages" saying "While copyright unification may be… [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal found that the original judgment was thorough, fair and well-reasoned and correct. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Within days of the BC filing, CSC Commissioner Don Head issued a statement to the media that the CSC was considering a “new model” for segregation. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by Kirk Jenkins
During the May term, the Illinois Supreme Court heard oral argument in Price v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal decision in Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311(27 March 2015) (Dyson MR and Sharp LJ in a joint judgment; McFarlane LJ concurring), affirming the judgment of Tugendhat J (at[2014] EWHC 13 (QB) (16 January 2014)), is a very important decision on damages for invasion of privacy, and it raises significant questions about the correctness of Feeney J’s reasoning in the earlier Irish case of Collins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March… [read post]