Search for: "Lake v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 1,394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2014, 1:38 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Dep't of Interior (gaming compact, "no-action" approval) * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2014dct.htmlMcVay v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:31 pm
Lake Worth Drainage Dist., for Use & Benefit of Martin, 87 So. 2d 49, 50 (Fla. 1956).In Vega v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:33 am
In this case involving the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness Act, Wilderness Watch, Sierra Club North Star Chapter, and Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness (collectively Wilderness Watch) brought suit against Abigail Kimbell, Chief of the United States Forest Service, and Ed Schafer, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (collectively Forest Service), alleging that the Forest Service's decision to construct a certain snowmobile… [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 2:57 pm by Unknown
United States (Wind Energy; National Environmental Policy Act; Endangered Species Act)Larson v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am by Joshua Matz
Last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 8:53 am by A. Hunter Faulkner, Esq.
The EPA classified the wetlands on the Sacketts’ lot as “waters of the United States” because they were near a ditch that fed into a creek, which fed into Priest Lake, a navigable, intrastate lake. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 11:15 am by Native American Rights Fund
Jewell (Attorney Fees, Trust Fund) United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlSisseton Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 12:53 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Workers Compensation Appeal Board (Common-law Marriage, Workers Compensation)* United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlAuga Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
In fact, the United States Fifth Circuit previously determined that the same exact gambling boat, the M/V Crown, was not a vessel.  [read post]