Search for: "Lambeth v. Lambeth"
Results 241 - 260
of 278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2012, 5:15 am
However, RBK&C maintained that such a breach could be averted by Mr De A's return to Portugal, where he would be eligible for appropriate support services, relying on R (Kimani) v London Borough of Lambeth [2003] EWCA Civ 1159 and N v UK (2008) 47 EHRR 885. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 5:01 am
So the LL has a discretion as to whether to proceed further.The other case the Court in Stafford considered was Forbes v Lambeth London Borough Council[2003] EWHC 222 (QB). [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
All of that was pretty standard stuff - based on R(A) v Lambeth - but a pretty innovative argument was addressed to the CA that previous cases on this point did not take account of the changes introduced in the Homelessness Act 2002. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm
No prejudice to the leaseholders had been found by the FTT, pursuant to Daejan Investments Ltd v Benson (2013) UKSC 14. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
In Kay v Lambeth [2006] 2 AC 465 the majority of the House of Lords established that, where a landlord has an otherwise unqualified right to possession, there are only two scenarios where the court should not proceed to summary judgment and an order for possession, which have since become known as gateways (a) and (b) (Lord Hope's now famous [110]). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
In Kay v Lambeth [2006] 2 AC 465 the majority of the House of Lords established that, where a landlord has an otherwise unqualified right to possession, there are only two scenarios where the court should not proceed to summary judgment and an order for possession, which have since become known as gateways (a) and (b) (Lord Hope's now famous [110]). [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:09 pm
(v) Their needs in terms of locality to maintain employment and or family support. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm
IPSO has handed down a number of recent rulings: 07543-18 White v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2018), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 05871-18 A Woman v Mail Online, 2 Privacy (2018), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2018), No breach – after investigation 05608-18 McBride v Scotland on Sunday, 3 Harassment (2018), 1 Accuracy (2018), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 05298-18 For Britain Movement v Sunday Life, 1… [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
On the same day Collins J gave judgment in the case of Dew v Mills Nanyn . [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On 28 July 2022, there were hearings in ABC and Others v London Borough of Lambeth and SJU and Others v London Borough of Lambeth before Nicklin J and in Nicolaisen v Nicolaisen before Jay J. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
In Kopecky v Slovakia (2005) 41 EHRR 944 it was said that A1P1 "does not guarantee the right to acquire property". [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm
Henson v Blackwood & Blackwood. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm
Henson v Blackwood & Blackwood. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 12:23 pm
Olinski v Islington LBC Lambeth County Court January 2013 This was a long leaseholder case, with Islington as the freeholder. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 12:23 pm
Olinski v Islington LBC Lambeth County Court January 2013 This was a long leaseholder case, with Islington as the freeholder. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm
In the Courts Mr Justice Tugendhat gave two judgments this week – one libel case McLaughlin v Lambeth LBC (see our post here) – and one privacy case, JIH v News Group Newspapers (see our post here). [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm
In Campbell v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:45 pm
(Finally) AA v London Borough of Southwark [2014] EWHC 500 (QB) This High Court judgment is remarkable in many ways, most of them worrying. [read post]
