Search for: "Lancaster v. Lancaster"
Results 241 - 260
of 482
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2013, 4:24 pm
In McQuiggin v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:38 am
" Herengracht Group LLC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:24 am
Last week, two more decisions in favor of the severance of post-Koken claims were handed down by the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, by Order only, on the basis of filings by the tortfeasor defendant:Saltzburg v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm
With respect to grand jury proceedings, the district attorney has a “duty of fair dealing to the accused” (People v Pelchat, 62 NY2d 97, 105 [1984]; see also, People v Lancaster, 69 NY2d 20, 26 [1986]) and to the court (People v Ianniello, 21 NY2d 418, 424 [1968]). [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 9:01 am
In Lancaster v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
Lancaster v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
Where the proprietor of a trade mark supplies to its authorised distributors items bearing that mark, intended for demonstration to consumers in authorised retail outlets, and bottles bearing the mark from which small quantities can be taken for supply to consumers as free samples, those goods, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, are not put on the market within the meaning of Directive 89/104 and Regulation No 40/94 [= Case C-127/09 Coty Prestige Lancaster v Simex,… [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 8:43 pm
As set forth by Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court in its 2009 decision in Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:26 pm
Insurance Applications In the case of Grassetti v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 9:52 pm
Los Angeles Region I Santa Monica (310) 899-1483 Region II Los Angeles (213) 617-8957 Region III Reseda (818) 757-1580 Region IV Pasadena (626) 793-3510 Region V Lakewood (562) 925-2346 Region VI San Dimas (909) 394-0416 Region VII Lancaster (661) 945-5563 Region VIII Burbank (818) 563-1957 Orange (714) 479-0107, (800) 300-6222 Riverside (951) 686-4402, (800) 464-1123 San Bernardino (909) 891-3928, (866) 229-0284 San Diego (858) 560-2507, (800)… [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 7:18 pm
Pate of Porter Wright Morris & Arthur in the firm's Employer Law Report If you are a trustee, read this - Lancaster lawyer Patti Spencer in her Pennsylvania Fiduciary Litigation Blog [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:53 pm
- Lancaster attorney Patti Spencer in her Pennsylvania Fiduciary Litigation Blog Pole dancing and an interesting insight into BigLaw document review - Chicago lawyer Patrick J. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 12:41 pm
Shoemaker v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:27 pm
Millemann of Weintraub Genshlea Chediak in the firm's IP Law Blog State found liable for beating on UT campus - Tennessee lawyer John Day of Day & Blair in his blog, Day on Torts ESOPs and company stock matches to 401(k): the Bear Stearns lesson - Lancaster attorney Michael Moore of Russell Krafft & Gruber in the firm's Pennsylvania Employment Law Blog Government reply briefly field with Supreme Court in Murphy v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:39 am
DB-v-Chrisandy-Complaint [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 6:44 am
Streiner v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 4:42 pm
- Hartford lawyer Daniel Schwartz of Pullman & Comley in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog Holding the Government to Its Promises: United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 10:06 am
., et. al. v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 5:55 am
Pequea Township v Zoning Hearing Board of Pequea, 2018 WL 1514221 (PA Cmwlth 1/8/2018) [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 6:59 pm
The opinion for the case of Hill v. [read post]
