Search for: "Land v. Board of Education" Results 241 - 260 of 622
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2012, 9:56 am by Sanford Rosen
Board of Education I & II (1954-55) was the law of the land. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by admin
  According to the Association’s evidence, more than 98% of all redevelopment agencies are governed by a board consisting of the county board of supervisors or city council that created the agency. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 10:11 am
Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
” 1863: The New Zealand Settlements Act, which authorized the government to confiscate land from certain tribes without compensation, was passed. 1877: In Wi Parata v The Bishop of Wellington, the chief justice of the Supreme Court declared the Treaty to be “worthless” and a “simple nullity. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:42 am
Fast forward to 1956, when North Carolina decided to deal with Brown v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:22 am
 Pix Credit HERE It is only appropriate that, as China's leading societal forces celebrate the 100th anniversary of its organization as the Communist Party of China, that  this vanguard consider carefully its own progress and the way it meets its responsibilities as the leading force charged with the guidance of the Chinese nation toward the establishment of a communist society. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
And as the district's largest landowner, Disney has effectively controlled the district's board, whose members were elected based on land ownership. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 7:51 pm
Board of Education was the law of the land and should be followed rather than resisted. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Board of Education of City of New York, 306 N.Y. 401, 118 N.E.2d 578; People ex rel. [20 A.D.2d 568] Harris v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
H), thereby beginning the running of the six-year statute of limitations anew (see General Obligations Law § 17-101; Lew Morris Demolition Co. v Board of Educ. of City of NY, 40 NY2d 516, 520-521 [1976]). [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 7:17 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A 2011 Ontario Municipal Board decision was upheld by the Divisional Court in Rosen v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
At Howe on the Court, Amy Howe makes some educated guesses about which justices may be writing the remaining opinions. [read post]