Search for: "Large v. Superior Court"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2017, 6:46 am
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Ellis v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 7:24 pm
According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the state’s highest court ruled in People v. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 4:00 pm
by Sophie Arseneault Employers celebrated the January 2017 decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Cook v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:52 am
In April 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 4:05 am
In Robles v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
A March 23, 2011 decision by Ontario Superior Court Master M.J. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:26 pm
In a 96-page per curiam opinion, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania has largely upheld a jury verdict against Wal-Mart in a case brought under Pennsylvania’s wage and hour laws. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Hammond v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:31 am
The Court cites a case from 2001, Slattery v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 9:32 am
Both the Superior Court of Pasquotank County and a North Carolina Court of Appeals denied the motion. [read post]
11 May 2017, 11:45 am
On May 3, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case, Anthony Rush and Tammy Rush v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 3:01 pm
Superior Court (1997) 16 Cal.4th 880, 892 [“the California Constitution amply established the existence of a fundamental public policy”]; see Green v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 8:49 am
Court considers long-term disability claim even though the employee never applied for long-term disability benefits The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently heard a case involving a disability insurance claim, Smith v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 8:49 am
Court considers long-term disability claim even though the employee never applied for long-term disability benefits The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently heard a case involving a disability insurance claim, Smith v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 3:55 pm
In Hassell v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:55 pm
Because, as noted, economic injury is itself a form of injury in fact, proof of lost money or property will largely overlap with proof of injury in fact. [] (See Troyk v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
The case, Bertrand v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 1:16 pm
Furthermore, the OLRB factually distinguished an earlier 2014 decision of the Ontario Superior Court in Paquette v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 6:14 am
Algarin v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:00 pm
Last week we reported on two recent decisions by the Pennsylvania Superior Court (an intermediate appellate court) in fen-phen litigation. [read post]
