Search for: "Law v. Phillips"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2013, 3:40 pm
Phillip Watts Enter., Inc., 560 So.2d 339, 341 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 am
[Mechanicsburg, Pa.] : Pennsylvania Bar Institute, c2011.KFP81 .P4 No.6789 AntitrustAntitrust law Fundamentals of antitrust law / Phillip E. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
The case illustrates how the law of defamation and the law of privacy are moving ever closer. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:03 pm
Phillips. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:40 pm
Mike Luery of KCRA reports that California has an estimated 78,000 sex offenders currently registered in the state, all of whom by law must remain on the registry for life. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:02 am
Reinstatement following termination pursuant to §73 of the Civil Service LawMatter of Hoover v County of Broome, 23 Misc 3d 1134(A) Judge Phillip R. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
McCalla of The Spence Law Firm, LLC, Jackson, WY; and Jeremy D. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 4:30 am
According to the Denver Post, the Colorado Civil Rights Commission on Friday affirmed the Initial Decision of an administrative law judge in Craig v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 9:17 am
The Second Circuit has held that it is within the State's police power to require children to be vaccinated in order to attend public school and that such a requirement does not violate the First Amendment or other constitutional rights.Citing Supreme Court precedent, the Second Circuit held that the right to practice religion freely does not include liberty to expose the community or the child to communicable disease or the latter to illhealth or death.The Second Circuit further held that the… [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:07 pm
Laing J cites Lord Sumption’s definition of harassment in 2013: “Harassment is a persistent and deliberate course of unreasonable and oppressive conduct, targeted at another person, which is calculated to and does cause that person alarm, fear or distress: see Thomas v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2002] EMLR 78 , para 30 (Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers MR). [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am
Article 10: The right to receive information Mr Sugar argued that he had the right to disclosure of the Report under Article 10 ECHR which he said recent Strasbourg case law made clear recognised a right of access to information (referring specifically to Matky v Czech Republic, Tarsasag v Hungary and Kenedi v Hungary). [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:55 pm
"Phillip Morris v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:02 am
We’ll also be looking at the latest developments in Leveson, the issue of Civil disobedience and the Rule of law, the Sedley v Sumption debate and finally, whether the rank of Queen’s Counsel should be abolished. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
From Monday 7 to Wednesday 9 March 2011, Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance and Collins will hear Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 1:44 pm
In the recent case, Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 1:00 pm
(Phillip Morris), No. 06-1965. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 2:35 pm
Hudson Insurance Company (Insurance; Tort Law) One case was decided on 6/25/21:Yellen v. [read post]
6 May 2017, 12:32 am
Phillips 66 Company (10th Cir., May 4, 2017) (affirming dismissal of discrimination claim under the ADA because Russell failed even to establish his prima facie case)MiscellaneousEdwards v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:24 pm
Workers Compensation/Occupational Safety and Disease*Razo v. [read post]
