Search for: "Lawrence v. Texas" Results 241 - 260 of 1,393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2008, 6:44 pm
Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986), reversed in 2003 by Lawrence v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 7:02 am
" From Reuters, Lawrence Hurley Reports that "U.S. top court backs Texas death row inmate in race case. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 8:26 pm
Mark Lawrence and his Diocese of South Carolina before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 2:09 pm
Mark Lawrence and his Diocese of South Carolina before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:48 pm by Lawrence Solum
The second is to explore the impact of Lawrence v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:33 am by Michael C. Dorf
Texas in 2003) and the right of same-sex couples to marry (recognized in Obergefell v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 3:47 am by John Kang
From the Advocate: The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals has ruled that the state’s antisodomy law is unconstitutional – 11 years after the U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 2:15 pm by Andrew Hamm
At Take Care, Justin Levitt connects today’s argument to yesterday’s argument in the Texas racial-gerrymandering cases, Abbott v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 6:16 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
" As the Fifth Circuit should have recognized, there was a reason Texas' prohibition on same-sex intimacy could not be successfully challenged until the state sought to prosecute John Lawrence. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 1:10 pm by Lindsay Stafford Mader
Speaking at a CLE hosted by the Austin LGBT Bar Association, Sanford Levinson—a professor of constitutional law and government at the University of Texas—said that it was clear as early as 2003’s Lawrence v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 2:04 pm by David Markus
While serving as attorney general, Pryor wrote a brief in defense of the Texas law banning sodomy that was later struck down in Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:01 am by Ken White
Justice Antonin Scalia, dissenting in Lawrence v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 7:28 am
Appeals Court Rules Strict Scrutiny Applies in "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Cases WITT V. [read post]