Search for: "Leathers v. Leathers" Results 241 - 260 of 542
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2013, 5:45 am by Christine Nielsen
Under federal law, minimum resale price maintenance has been considered lawful if reasonable under the circumstances since the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
 001518950 - written in ‘futura’ type and modified graphically), in relation to several classes of goods, including Class 18 (leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes; animal skins; trunks; valises; umbrellas; parasols; walking sticks; whips, harness and saddlery) and Class 25 (clothing, footwear; headgear). [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:08 am
 For the answer to that question we turn to Case C‑655/11 P, Seven for all mankind LLC v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Seven SpA SAM applied to register the word sign SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND as a Community trade mark for ‘jewellery, namely, jewellery made of precious metals and stones, bracelets, earrings, rings, necklaces, cufflinks, tie tacks, tie fasteners, pins, watches, watchbands, belt buckles of precious metals’ (Class 14) and… [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:10 am by Kevin
Probably the best-known case on this is Leonard v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 9:10 pm by Barry Barnett
In that case, Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:56 pm
The demand of the police that the four or five suspects held at the social club produce their money and turn it over exceeded the self-protective margin for intrusion fixed by Terry v. [read post]