Search for: "Levinson v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 441
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable on theSecond Amendment, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
5 May 2008, 7:11 am
Part V concludes with the problem of false constitutional necessity.This is the final published version of constitutional possibilities! [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 7:38 pm
” The Court adhered to its prior holding in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 11:39 am
Part V concludes with a brief exploration of the problem of false constitutional necessity. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm
” [Adjunct Law Prof Blog] * Handbags at dawn: can’t get enough of the Gucci v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 9:50 am
Part V concludes with the problem of false constitutional necessity. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:20 pm
New York and Plessy v. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 10:43 am
https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/articles/article-ii The Interactive Constitution: Understanding The Electoral College Sanford V. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:50 am
The civil rights revolution begins with the Supreme Court's 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Lash has a sixty-page selection of post-ratification materials, including, for example, The Slaughter-House Cases and United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988) (4 justice majority of 7-justice court). [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 9:43 am
See, State Board of Equalization v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm
United States United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 11:18 pm
Here is the authors’ guest post: On November 5, 2012, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:51 am
Levinson. [read post]
14 May 2018, 4:30 am
States distrust concentrations of state power. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
” This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Thus, for those frustrated with (or openly hostile to) particular elements of the Constitution, such as Article V, brevity has provided a path forward. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
So I follow Lessig and Pozen in holding not only that apportioned delegates should be chosen in special elections, and they should not be identified with political parties on the ballots – although I am open to Levinson’s suggestion to select delegates from each state by lottery from a qualified pool of citizens, as long as they could each take one non-voting expert with them (compare Vile p.140). [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
This is not to say that there have not been moments of state oppression for which armed resistance would have been helpful: think black Americans in the Jim Crow south. [read post]
