Search for: "Long v. Davis"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,081
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2022, 9:25 am
Davis, 531 U. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:34 am
Davis is misplaced. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
” 3 KENNETH DAVIS, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TREATISE, § 20.04 at 74 (1958); accord, Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) has published the UK government’s long-awaited response to the consultation on the future of the UK data protection regime. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
” See “One of Long Island’s Stateliest Homes,” Town & Country (Nov. 30, 2007) at 12. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
Jennifer Davis: market for brands is huge and ongoing. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Rogers v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Stanley Fish reminds me, however, that long ago I defined my role as a teacher in part as hectoring students to declare who is “getting it right” and for what reasons. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Registration v. acquisition is also a big deal. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 11:36 am
But the contrast with the earlier case of Contractreal Ltd v Davies (2001) EWCA Civ 928 was resolveable. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
In reviewing respondents' determination, which was made without a hearing, "the issue is whether the action taken had a 'rational basis' and was not 'arbitrary and capricious' " (Matter of Ward v City of Long Beach, 20 NY3d 1042, 1043 [2013]). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
In reviewing respondents' determination, which was made without a hearing, "the issue is whether the action taken had a 'rational basis' and was not 'arbitrary and capricious' " (Matter of Ward v City of Long Beach, 20 NY3d 1042, 1043 [2013]). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm
Self-service kiosks under fire Davis v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
” “It is well settled that “[a]n attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of the retainer” (Genesis Merchant Partners, L.P. v Gilbride, Tusa, Last & Spellane, LLC, 157 AD3d 479,482 [1st Dept 2018], citingAmbase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Second, we present evidence on public-company disclosures consistent with issuers’ understanding that the SEC has long had authority to take regulatory action in this area. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (2015) and Rucho v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
In that statute, Congress exercised its power under Section 3 to lift the disabilities that the provision had imposed upon large categories of Confederate officers and officials—in essence, all but the highest-ranking ones, like Confederate president Jefferson Davis. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
White supremacists probably expected Plessy v. [read post]
