Search for: "Long v. Standard Oil Co."
Results 241 - 260
of 339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm
Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 88 Ga.App. 241, 246, 76 S.E.2d 408 (1953), a case which closely parallels the facts here. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
, Schering-Plough Corp – Following dispute over trade dress with Schering-Plough, Fruit of the Earth announces plan to change its package design: (IP Law360), US: Quanta and its impact on biotechnology: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), US: BIO files amicus brief asking CAFC to cabin in scope of KSR and hold that its obvious to try dicta does not abrogate the Deuel standard: In re Kubin: (Patently-O), US: StemCells gets patent on enriched central nervous system stem cell and… [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
The Supreme Court decided American Tobacco on the same day Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
The Supreme Court decided American Tobacco on the same day Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
ISSUES AND STANDARDS OF REVIEW A. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Oil Gas & Energy L. 125-176 (2011-2012). [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
The codes developed following the passage of the NIRA governed many of America's major industrial sectors: lumber, steel, oil, mining, and automobiles. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 5:31 am
Curaçao Dry Dock Co. 2008). [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Charlotte Observer, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Co. has agreed to pay a $4 million penalty for a 2005 chlorine and diesel fuel spill that killed nine people and polluted a creek in western South Carolina, the federal government said Monday. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
Subjective and Objective Standards for Determining the Parties’ Intentions Depending on the jurisdiction, courts use either an objective or subjective standard to determine the parties’ intentions.[30] In jurisdictions that use a subjective standard, the parties’ intentions are considered a question of fact, not a question of law, and courts thus defer the question to the jury to determine.[31] In jurisdictions that use an objective standard,… [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:31 am
However, the bond rally did not last long. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am
Because those are federal statutes, they can’t be “preempted” the way state-law claims were in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
These U.S. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
It offered "substantial authority" that the "plain meaning" of §1441(b) "establishes that, so long as [defendant] removed this case prior to being served with process, removal was proper. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
In addition, EPA shall, no later than November 16, 2011, sign for publication in the Federal Register a notice of final rulemaking setting forth EPA’s final emission standards for coal- and oil-fired EGUs pursuant to CAA section 112(d). [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in… [read post]
