Search for: "Long v. Thompson" Results 241 - 260 of 820
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In considering the defendant's claim to a qualified privilege, the Appellate Division said that "the underlying rationale behind a qualified privilege is that so long as the privilege is not abused, the flow of information between parties sharing a common interest should not be impeded. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 11:34 am by Kent Scheidegger
Thompson writes:After his release, J.T. considered the long list of innocent men sent to prison by prosecutors in that same office who had withheld evidence. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 7:35 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee also was entitled to proceed with her retaliation claim based on the HR manager’s threats following her internal complaints, and the formal discipline she received, shortly after filing her EEOC charge, for events that took place long before she complained of the harassment (Thompson v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:14 am by Gritsforbreakfast
American law is an outlier on this one.Jury selection critiquesHouston law prof and Grits contributing writer Sandra Guerra Thompson has posted an older article on SSRN critiquing jury selection procedures in the context of Miller El v. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 8:30 am by Melissa Milewski
Here is a brief excerpt from the archival record of the case:"City of Harrodsburg v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"As to Thompson's claims with respect to §75, in Antinore v Stat, 40 NY2d 6, the Court of Appeals ruled that a public employee's collective bargaining agent could bargain away the employee’s statutory disciplinary rights in favor of an alternative disciplinary procedure so long as the alternate procedure provided constitutional due process protections equivalent to those available under the statutory procedure that it replaced.. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"As to Thompson's claims with respect to §75, in Antinore v Stat, 40 NY2d 6, the Court of Appeals ruled that a public employee's collective bargaining agent could bargain away the employee’s statutory disciplinary rights in favor of an alternative disciplinary procedure so long as the alternate procedure provided constitutional due process protections equivalent to those available under the statutory procedure that it replaced.. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"As to Thompson's claims with respect to §75, in Antinore v Stat, 40 NY2d 6, the Court of Appeals ruled that a public employee's collective bargaining agent could bargain away the employee’s statutory disciplinary rights in favor of an alternative disciplinary procedure so long as the alternate procedure provided constitutional due process protections equivalent to those available under the statutory procedure that it replaced.. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:27 am by Graham Smith
This is achieved by requiring a degree of formality and solemnity.Ensuring that formalities do not act as a deterrent to putative testators whether through complexity, cost, consumption of time or uncertainty as to how to achieve compliance.Minimising the risk of a testator’s intentions being defeated by an actual failure to comply with formalities or an inability to demonstrate that formalities were in fact complied with.Providing protection against fraud, tampering and forgery, either of the… [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:27 am by Graham Smith
This is achieved by requiring a degree of formality and solemnity.Ensuring that formalities do not act as a deterrent to putative testators whether through complexity, cost, consumption of time or uncertainty as to how to achieve compliance.Minimising the risk of a testator’s intentions being defeated by an actual failure to comply with formalities or an inability to demonstrate that formalities were in fact complied with.Providing protection against fraud, tampering and forgery, either of the… [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Below the options it states:Benefits of Paying Your Debt — Save $1,366.54 if you pay by 03-05-2017 — — Put this debt behind you — — No more communication on this account — — Peace of Mind —The bottom of the letter, in small but readable font, states:The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt and how long a debt can appear on your credit report. [read post]