Search for: "MARCUS v. MARCUS"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Apple FRAND ruling could be delayed by Justice Marcus Smith's new merger case (Microsoft-ActivisionBlizzard) It's been almost a year since the Optis Wireless v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:02 am
Marcus A. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:29 pm
The ABA journal reports on the Wellons v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 9:39 am
Marcus Silva’s petition states that under Texas’ murder and wrongful-death statutes, a self-managed abortion is the crime of murder, and the three women can be sued for wrongful death. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 10:34 am
See Lenel Systems Int’l., Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:07 am
Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs, Phillip Gover, Jillian Pappan, and Courtney Tsotigh v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:07 am
Marcus v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 8:50 am
In Gridiron Management Group LLC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 3:57 pm
From Eleventh Circuit Judge Stanley Marcus's concurrence in Speech First, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 3:08 pm
The following opinion recap is by Marcus Smith, a summer associate at Akin Gump and a student at Yale Law School. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 9:31 am
MARCUS A. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Schreiner, Jr., January 13, 2013) Cratchit v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:01 am
A recent United States Tax Court case, Gaines v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
In Verition Partners Master Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In a written statement, Marcus G. [read post]
28 May 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In a written statement, Marcus G. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 10:47 am
On appeal in Simon v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:10 pm
The case is Loving v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 5:17 am
The entire panel of the Court recently reconsidered a 2020 opinion in Hewitt v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 3:22 am
Pointing to its ruling in Marcus v. [read post]