Search for: "MATTER OF A P"
Results 241 - 260
of 20,375
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm
Shame on the Miami Herald! [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 3:12 pm
Jeffrey P. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 12:32 pm
Earl Warren and Why the BART Cell-Phone Shutdown Matters [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 9:09 am
Repealing Defense of Marriage Act Is Cast As a Civil Rights Matter [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:43 pm
Jeffrey P. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
If so, who would fund those members’ defences and/or meet the judgment is a matter to be considered. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 10:53 am
Marcus P. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 1:22 pm
Jeffrey P. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 11:55 am
Jeffrey P. [read post]
2 May 2024, 11:57 am
Jeffrey P. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:16 am
When you have issues with legal matter that you can’t resolve yourself you can get Debt settlement help and forget about the problems that existed. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 7:13 pm
</p> [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 6:06 am
” Does this mean Media Matters no longer thinks she is “progressive”? [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
Premiums for both Non-Executive Board Chair roles and Lead Director roles have also increased in prevalence and quantum since 2015, potentially indicating an increased emphasis of these roles on corporate governance matters. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
Premiums for both Non-Executive Board Chair roles and Lead Director roles have also increased in prevalence and quantum since 2015, potentially indicating an increased emphasis of these roles on corporate governance matters. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 11:48 am
Jeffrey P. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 9:00 am
Jeffrey P. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:06 am
Jeffrey P. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 6:53 am
However, this issue had not been addressed by the New York courts until last Friday when the Fourth Department was confronted by the question in Matter of Bobbijean P. v Stephanie P., 2007 NY Slip Op 07173. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 11:56 am
The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, agreed, and therefore modified the judgment by vacating those provisions.The Court explained that "[p]ursuant to the Laws of 2009 (ch 496, § 15), the amendments to, inter alia, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1198 are not applicable to defendant because he committed his offense before November 18, 2009, the date of the enactment of those amendments." [read post]
