Search for: "MATTER OF ADOPTION OF A J R" Results 241 - 260 of 1,714
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2021, 7:04 am by Jan von Hein
Furthermore, the author discusses matters of succession and argues: According to the ECJ’s Mahnkopf decision, a right of inheritance of the adopted child in relation to the biological parents under the laws applicable to the effects of the adoption, as provided for in Texas, has to be characterised as a succession rule, at least if that law provides for a mere right of inheritance, whereas all legal family relations to the biological family are cut off. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 10:20 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
The subcommittee will hear testimony from Yogananda Pittman, acting Capitol Police chief; J. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 3:05 am by Giesela Ruehl
Its aim was to examine the legal framework concerning civil and commercial matters involving intellectual property rights that are connected to more than one State and to address the issues that had emerged after the adoption of several legislative proposals in this field in different regions of the world. [read post]
After a dramatic shift in public opinion, the Supreme Court (by a narrow majority) made gay marriage a national reality. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 12:14 pm by Tia Sewell
CSIS experts Jacob Kurtzer and J. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 6:56 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
March 30, 2021 Ignelzi, J.), the Motions Court Judge in Allegheny County, Judge Phillip Ignelzi, abrogated the Judge Wettick approach for Allegheny County moving forward and adopted Judge Nealon’s approach as enunciated in Karim v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:54 am
  In some instances these issues touch on matters that have significant relevance to political and legal theory generally, and for this reason alone are worth reading. [read post]
On 12 March 2021, Marcus Smith J handed down a formidable 42 page judgment on consequential matters (the “Consequentials Judgment”, a copy of which can be found here). [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
Act § 1089[d] did not warrant reversal of change of permanency goal where  it heard extensive testimony regarding the child’s emotional state and best interests,             In Matter of Isayah R., 189 A.D.3d 1942 (3d Dept.,2021) respondent was the mother of a child (born in 2010) who had special needs. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 10:46 am by Josh Blackman
Indeed, we also think that reading is correct as a matter of original public meaning—at least with respect to the Constitution of 1788. [read post]