Search for: "MATTER OF B D C"
Results 241 - 260
of 8,654
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
’s matter, the fitness of the sentence was not challenged in the S.C.C. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
And this literature, the assumption notes, is “pointing to the activity of using [a] doctrine and skills [b] in context [c] in combination with the exercise of [d] critical perspectives, values, and habits as necessary for professional formation. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
And this literature, the assumption notes, is “pointing to the activity of using [a] doctrine and skills [b] in context [c] in combination with the exercise of [d] critical perspectives, values, and habits as necessary for professional formation. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 11:19 am
“(a) 17 January 2026 for the legal acts listed in points 3 and 4 of Annex I Legal acts in the area of judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters] [and the legal acts listed in points 1, 10 and 11 of Annex II [Legal acts in the area of judicial cooperation in criminal matters]; Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 (b) 17 January 2027 for the legal acts listed in points 1, 8, 9 and 10 of Annex I and the legal acts listed in points 5… [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Others have gone down this dubious path before, but these authors’ embrace of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ opinion in Bendectin litigation reveals the insubstantiality and the invalidity of their method.[18] As Professor Ronald Allen put the matter: “Given the weight of evidence in favor of Bendectin’s safety, it seems peculiar to argue for mosaic evidence [WOE] from a case in which it would have plainly been misleading. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 12:38 pm
It states as follows: Part B (Zero-Point Offenders) Subpart 1 (Adjustment for Certain Zero-Point Offenders) Chapter Four is amended by inserting at the end the following new Part C: PART C ― ADJUSTMENT FOR CERTAIN ZERO-POINT OFFENDERS 4C1.1. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm
B. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 8:21 am
Notably, repeat violations escalate from a Class C to a Class B misdemeanor, reflecting the severity of the offense. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
B. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm
As attorney Karen C. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
They were also “genus claims,” meaning they were claims to a class of related items, not a single item; it is a scientific reality that a claim for ‘an antibody binding to X protein that targets regions a, b, c, and d with Y strength’ probably encompasses thousands of different antibodies. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 8:03 am
Children are usually angry at the absent parent no matter whose fault the absence is. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm
Mark B. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
In case you were wondering, under section 531(d) a “dating partner” means— a person who is or has been in a social relationship of a romantic or intimate nature with such specific person based on a consideration of— (A) the length of the relationship; (B) the type of relationship; (C) the frequency of interaction between the persons involved in the relationship; and (D) the extent of physical intimacy or sexual contact between the persons… [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
The New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) has finalized amendments (“Amended Regulation”) to its cybersecurity rule (“Cybersecurity Rule”) that applies to financial institutions licensed by the NYDFS. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
In today’s rapidly evolving corporate landscape, the composition of boards is not just a matter of compliance or social responsibility; it’s a strategic imperative that shapes the future of firms. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:12 am
(b) This proclamation shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Supreme Court observed that the Automatic Orders are codified within DRL § 236(B)(2)(b). [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:20 am
Vice versa, the sole provision of mandatory collective management under national law would be unduly restrictive and contrary to the wording of that provision.France was the first EU Member State to transpose Article 15 and, immediately upon entry into force of the new legislation, a sense of déjà-vu clearly emerged, given that key addressees like Google announced that they would request French press publishers to waive their right. [read post]
