Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B"
Results 241 - 260
of 3,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2007, 7:45 am
B J 1 (estimating the rate of patent approvals by the PTO to be 97%). [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 3:18 am
J.). [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 6:15 pm
(c) If the Special Counsel believes it is necessary and appropriate, the Special Counsel is authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 1:58 am
As I have previously discussed on this blog, the boundary-enforcing function of the one-year bar makes § 315(b) a robust statutory limit on the Director’s discretion in institution-related matters. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:42 pm
Firstly, the Mostyn J judgment authorising the c-section. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
Food & Drug Admin. et al., No. 2009-1495) arguing that a stayed judgment is not a “judgment” within the meaning of FDC Act § 505(j)(5)(B)(iii)(I)(aa) (ANDA) and FDC Act § 505(c)(3)(C)(i) (505(b)(2)) terminating the 30-month stay on approval, and that as a result of the Federal Circuit’s September 10th decision vacating the New Jersey district court’s judgment, the 30-month stay on ANDA/505(b)(2) approval was… [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
(c) A patent application involves two different aspects. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:13 am
United States District Judge Janet C. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 8:18 pm
For those reasons, Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal for lack of eligible subject matter will be the exception, not the rule. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
(c) Sweeney J, Eady J, Mann J and Vos J? [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:47 pm
John J. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm
B/c TM have become untethered from any rational basis whatsoever. [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:13 pm
It is possible that C might be able to buy B’s lease, in which case C’s lease would merge with it and be subsumed. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:05 am
b. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
., No. 2017-C-3103 (C.P. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:56 am
B. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 11:00 pm
§1303.505(b) and (c), the Plaintiff’s allegations of “gross” negligence were immaterial to the Plaintiff’s malpractice burden of proof and, as such, would be stricken as impertinent matter in accordance with Pa. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
J. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:33 am
(j) Whether the principal is or is not in business. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:00 am
C-48-CV-2019-6973 (C.P. [read post]
