Search for: "MATTER OF POWERS v. Powers"
Results 241 - 260
of 21,498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2011, 9:52 am
Interior Contr., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 10:28 am
Scindhia v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:56 am
Case: Frankel v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am
Omar Qureshi, Dan Tench and Cathryn Hopkins of CMS comment on the decision which was handed down on 15 May 2019 by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal and others [2019] UKSC 22: On 15 May 2019, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment, deciding by a slim majority of 4:3 that an “ouster clause” in section 67(8) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000… [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 6:46 pm
In City of Austin v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 5:25 am
In Matter of Wind Power Ethics Group (WPEG) v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Frew Run Gravel Products, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2024, 4:09 pm
As a matter of corporate law, I assume so. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:05 pm
The facts of Attorney General v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:56 pm
A legislator might have a strong view about the particular matter when he casts a vote, or he might simply be voting to please contributors or the party, Scalia notes. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 1:22 am
Those concerned may very strongly wish that the facts relating to such matters are not made public… Experience however shows, in this country and elsewhere, that publicity is a powerful disinfectant. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 3:00 pm
This focus on the Executive Branch usurping legislative power rather than Congress delegating legislative power is not just a matter of semantics. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 4:48 pm
Caneast Foods Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 2:14 am
Ryanair Holdings Ltd v Office of Fair Trading and another; [2011] EWCA Civ 1579; [2011] WLR (D) 392 “The Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules granted a power to suspend the running of time, with regard to an investigation by the OFT, as a matter of urgency and in order to protect the public interest.” WLR Daily, 21st December 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
Their Lordships who decided the matter, observed as follows : “......... [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
It is named after the Supreme Court’s 1984 opinion in Chevron v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:59 am
The Supreme Court has decided exactly one case involving the privilege, and even that decision—in the Watergate tapes case, United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 12:34 pm
” (citing State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 3:59 am
As a constitutional matter, Whiting breaks no new ground; it is merely an application of De Canas v. [read post]
