Search for: "MATTER OF R T"
Results 241 - 260
of 53,756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2019, 3:49 am
R. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:04 pm
The Answers to Questions newsletter is free so don't miss the next issue. [read post]
Law Firm Payroll Processing; Time Matters 9; Olympus DS-330; Nuance; Data Rot; New Lawyer; Much More
26 Mar 2009, 2:38 pm
Don't miss this issue. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 9:18 pm
James R. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 12:14 pm
These types of trucks are heavy and usually can’t stop quickly. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 10:49 am
T 999/93 [3] and, for an Opposition Division, T 390/86 [7]). [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
Moreover, it was held that claims 6 to 8, the features of which are now present in claims 1, 5 and 6, did not fulfil the requirements of R 43.However, the impugned decision is not based on grounds of which objections of non-compliance with A 84 and R 43 form part.[9] As already found in decision T 1640/06, objections that do not form part of the grounds for a refusal of an application, in particular objections in obiter dicta, can be meant as voluntary information to an… [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
What matters is that before taking a final decision on the appeal the member must be able to form an opinion based on his/her proper perception, study (Kenntniserlangung) of the factual situation and assessment of all relevant questions. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:53 am
Indeed, not many design matters have received the publicity if not passionate outcry that we have seen in case of the ‘Puma-Rihanna’ decision issued by the General Court of the EU (6 March 2024, Case T-647/22). [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:23 am
But does it actually matter? [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 11:01 am
The fact that the appellant had no opportunity to comment on all the grounds on which the decision appears to have been based constituted a substantial procedural violation within the meaning of A 113(1) and R 103. [5.4] For these reasons the decision under appeal must be set aside and the case remitted to the department of first instance for further prosecution. [5.5] In these circumstances, it is equitable to order the reimbursement of the appeal fee in accordance with R… [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 6:03 pm
Handy, “[t]he issue is concoction or collaboration, not contact”. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 8:29 am
Kerner and Brandon R. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:38 am
CROWD ESTIMATE: ‘One Nation’ Rally: Liberal Media Concludes Size Doesn’t Matter. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 7:17 am
The taking into account of this argument necessarily leads to the consideration of the applicant's argumentation concerning the inventive step of the subject-matter of claim 1. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:25 pm
I didn't think they got that . . . racy over at First Things. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:38 am
DOES THAT MATTER? [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:35 pm
He also has, in the realm of humor, what the French call "I don't know what". [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
In this respect, the [opponent] cited inter alia decisions T 932/93 and T 358/08, which confirmed that a request according to R 99(1)(c) could be implicit, the extent of the appeal being a matter for the grounds of appeal. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 6:03 pm
Handy, “[t]he issue is concoction or collaboration, not contact”. [read post]
