Search for: "MATTER OF SUTTON v. Sutton" Results 241 - 260 of 308
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2015, 5:06 pm by Giles Peaker
The matter went to trial where the landlord disputed notice, but lost on that point. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:01 am by Anthony Sanders
To learn more in general check out Judge Jeffrey Sutton's excellent books.) [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:43 am by Joy Waltemath
Affirming the fee award, a Sixth Circuit panel explained that accepting the lower offer was one measure of success (or lack thereof), that Rule 68 did not conflict with the fee-shifting statute at issue, and that the reduction was reasonable (McKelvey v Secretary of United States Army, September 18, 2014, Sutton, J). [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:05 am by SHG
’” In dissent, Judge Jeffrey Sutton points out the absurd conundrum. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:58 pm by Lyle Denniston
Judge Silberman’s opinion in the case of Seven-Sky v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am by John Elwood
Judge John Rogers (who apparently ties judge Jeffrey Sutton as the 6th Circuit’s most prolific judge) dissented on the grounds that the Bivens claims were precluded by the FTCA’s judgment bar. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:33 am by Victoria Kwan
“I do try to save them for when it counts, when it really matters. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm by Laurence Tribe
But as Judge Jeffrey Sutton concisely put the point in his careful and exhaustive concurring opinion upholding the Act in Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Julie Johnson v Daily Mail: This concerned an article in the Daily Mail with the same subject matter. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:19 pm by Ashby Jones
Without a circuit split, it’s an entirely different matter. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:22 am by Jag
They referred to the recent decision of Mohamed and CF v SSHD (2014) a case which sought to quash the claimants’ control orders and TPIMs. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:22 am by Jag
They referred to the recent decision of Mohamed and CF v SSHD (2014) a case which sought to quash the claimants’ control orders and TPIMs. [read post]