Search for: "MATTER OF T A G"
Results 241 - 260
of 5,918
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2023, 2:05 am
Well, ask Rudy G. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
My perennial reminder: if you can’t define it, you can’t regulate it. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 1:45 pm
For many Jews, law became an onerous burden rather than a path to connecting with G-d. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 6:44 am
That doesn’t seem smart. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 11:08 pm
Steven G. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
SALI tags can be used on (1) matters, (2) documents, and Matter tags. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:06 pm
The minutes of oral proceedings have been published from the referring Board of Appeal case behind G 2/21 (T 0116/18). [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 11:08 am
The G-A-L Method is more than a technique—it’s a game-changer. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:29 am
Matter of C-G-T- "The respondent testified that he was abused by his father as a child because of his sexual orientation. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 7:00 am
He was disbarred and ordered to pay costs, and the matter was referred to the Attorney General for possible criminal prosecution. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:57 am
The lack of confusion evidence also mattered some. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 1:52 am
And privacy and legal are not the only teams interested in finding that to, you know, the security team, very interested, but also the engineering team and the hosting costs of holding on to data that you really don’t need. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:17 pm
I am sorry but I don't like this. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 8:45 am
Dutta/T. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:50 am
David G Robertson has referred to its “clumsy mistakes”.[4] These could have been avoided had the Government “commissioned someone with a training in the academic study of religion. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 11:03 am
" More recently, in C1.G v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 9:50 am
[Defendant] represents that he may be opposing the [plaintiff]’s request for a [g]et. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:52 pm
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here) Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
" Speech by public employees related to their employment holds "special value" because "[g]overnment employees are often in the best position to know what ails the agencies for which they work," and because they "'are uniquely qualified to comment' on 'matters concerning government policies that are of interest to the public at large.'" Accordingly, the fact that the speech at issue here related to Griffin's employment is… [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
First, it will often be important to educate the gatekeeper about the distinction between descriptive and analytic studies, and the inability of descriptive studies such as case reports to support causal inferences.[5] There is then the matter of confusion within the judiciary and among “scholars” about whether a hierarchy even exists. [read post]
