Search for: "MERRELL" Results 241 - 260 of 601
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2014, 7:29 am by Lisa Kömives
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (U.S. 1993), the Supreme Court held that “[f]aced with a proffer of expert scientific testimony ... the trial judge must determine at the outset ... whether the expert is proposing to testify to (1) scientific knowledge that (2) will assist the trier of fact to understand or determine a fact in issue. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by John Elwood
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 10:44 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals in 1993, which allows for the standard of flexible reliability. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 pm by Alex Craigie
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States Supreme Court held for the first time that, to be admissible, scientific evidence must be both scientifically valid and properly applicable to the facts at issue in the case. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 pm by Alex Craigie
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States Supreme Court held for the first time that, to be admissible, scientific evidence must be both scientifically valid and properly applicable to the facts at issue in the case. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am by John Elwood
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:19 pm by Allison Tussey
Michael Wilson, 61, Merrells Inlet, South Carolina, a former DSD employee, was sentenced to five years of supervised release and community service for participating in DSD’s flipping scheme. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 10:59 am
Among those being sued in the US are Grunenthal GMBH and American companies Merrell Richardson, now Sanofi-Aventis, and Smith, Kline and French, now GlaxoSmithKline. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:41 am by Lisa Kömives
Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), wrote that in order to decide Defendants’ motions to exclude expert testimony the trial court judge must determine whether the proposed expert will testify to expert knowledge that will assist the trier of fact to understand or determine a fact at issue. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:52 am by David Bernstein
Merrell Dow’s lawyers therefore relied on a clever, literal reading of FRE 702 and won the case. (3) I wrote an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal days after Daubert explaining that the Court basically got things right, and the lower courts’ new gatekeeping function was going to keep out “junk science. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:57 am by Peter Tillers
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 599 (1993) (Rehnquist, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (“the various briefs filed in this case … deal with definitions of scientific knowledge, scientific method, scientific validity, and peer review—in short, matters far afield from the expertise of judges”); Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. [read post]