Search for: "MGN" Results 241 - 260 of 542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by INFORRM
Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” – Edward Craven Case Preview: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Twitter libel trial about meaning and serious harm Defamation Act 2013: A Summary and Overview – Iain Wilson and Max Campbell Case Law: “Spiller v Joseph – the New Defence of Honest Comment” – Catherine Rhind The Perils of “Revenge… [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:27 pm by INFORRM
In Gulati v MGN [2015] EWCA Civ 1291 – one of the phone-hacking cases – the Court of Appeal affirmed the principle that damages for non-pecuniary loss for the misuse of private information should have some “reasonable relationship” with damages for personal injury. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
The most popular Inforrm posts of the summer covered a variety of themes: Brexit and the Tragic Downfall of British Media – Steven Barnett Case Law: Simpson v MGN, Court of Appeal creates a new distinction between “defamatory meaning” and “sting” – Jonathan Coad Case Law, Belgium: Olivier G v Le Soir. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Times Newspaper Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; Frost & Ors v MGN Ltd, heard 24-26 January 2017 Isle of Wight Council v Platt, heard 31 January 2017 Hartley & Ors v King Edward VI College, heard 1 February 2017 IPCO (Nigeria) Ltd v Nigeria National Petroleum Corp, heard 2 February 2017 Plevin v Paragon Personal Finance Ltd, heard 6 February 2017 Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd, heard 7 February 2017 Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council, heard 8-9 February… [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal said that the judge had “carefully reviewed the emerging jurisprudence on the appropriate level of damages for misuse of private information” [12]  He had referred to Campbell v MGN [2002] EWCA. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 10:27 am by INFORRM
  Another possibility is Ferdinand v MGN - where the appeal was disposed of by consent on 18 December 2011 – although there was no injunction in place in that case either. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
In 2011, the Court held in MGN Ltd v United Kingdom [2011] ECHR 66 that 100% uplifts on CFAs (when paid by the losing party) was also a breach of free speech rights. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am by INFORRM
This is the third of a three part post dealing with the key libel cases over the last twelve months or so in England and Wales. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts As mentioned above, Fancourt J continued to hear the trial of Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
The ICO is seeking permission to appeal the ruling on Clearview AI Inc handed down by the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights) on 17 October 2023. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Note that the judgment in another Mirror Hacking Litigation case, Winstone v MGN Ltd [2019] EWHC 265 (Ch) is now available on Bailii. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
On 13 June 2019 was a hearing before Norris J in the case of Winstone v MGN. [read post]
11 May 2020, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
He reaffirmed the Court of Appeal’s finding in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1373 that the defendant’s state of mind is irrelevant to the tort of misuse of private information. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
One concern the Daily Mirror had related to allegations that MGN’s legal department had been aware of widespread use of unlawful information gathering techniques. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 23 July 2019 Mann J heard an application by the Claimants in the case of Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal wrongly interpreted and relied on the case of Gulati v MGN, which found that “loss of control” damages were available for persistent phone-hacking. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 26 and 27 November 2020 Mann J heard another CMC in the phone hacking case of Various Claimants v MGN Ltd. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
More recently, in Ferdinand v MGN Limited [2011] EWHC 2454 (QB) Nicol J said that a substantial body of the public would consider that the England football captain fell within Buxton LJ’s list of “those from whom higher standards were expected”. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On 19 January 2015, Warby J heard applications in the case of Simpson v MGN. [read post]