Search for: "MGN"
Results 241 - 260
of 542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2011, 5:09 pm
The Court of Appeal said that the judge had “carefully reviewed the emerging jurisprudence on the appropriate level of damages for misuse of private information” [12] He had referred to Campbell v MGN [2002] EWCA. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:27 am
And it is a decade now since the seminal decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 1:23 pm
Thus in Theakston v MGN ([2002] EMLR 398) although the claimant was refused an injunction to restrain publication of a story about a visit to a brothel, he did grant an injunction to restrain the publication of a photograph of the claimant inside the brothel. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 4:53 pm
The most popular Inforrm posts of the summer covered a variety of themes: Brexit and the Tragic Downfall of British Media – Steven Barnett Case Law: Simpson v MGN, Court of Appeal creates a new distinction between “defamatory meaning” and “sting” – Jonathan Coad Case Law, Belgium: Olivier G v Le Soir. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:34 am
The decision of the ECtHR in MGN v United Kingdom, which held that the AJA scheme was incompatible with article 10 of the Convention, concerned the balancing of the rights guaranteed by article 10 with article 6 rights. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 4:03 pm
The Judge’s approach to anonymity (and that expounded in the Gray and JIH cases) should be contrasted with that of Sharp J in the XJA case last month and that of Eady J in his recently published judgment CDE v MGN plc ([2010] EWHC 3308 (QB)) where, after a contested inter partes hearing and numerous submissions , he gave a detailed explanation of his decision to grant anonymity in a non-blackmail case (see [74] to [89]). [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:57 am
” Where there is “a situation giving rise to favouritism or advancement through corruption” (Campbell v MGN Ltd 2004) then it could be legitimate to publish the fact that there had been a sexual relationship. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 4:01 pm
More recently, an early decision under the new Defamation Act, Cooke v MGN Ltd, suggests that a “prompt and prominent” apology may even go so far as to a neutralise the serious harm needed to found a claim. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
This is the third of a three part post dealing with the key libel cases over the last twelve months or so in England and Wales. [read post]
11 May 2020, 4:02 pm
He reaffirmed the Court of Appeal’s finding in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1373 that the defendant’s state of mind is irrelevant to the tort of misuse of private information. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
Judgment Damages In considering damages, Master Bell dealt with the purpose of damages in a defamation action as outlined in John v MGN Limited [1997] QB 586. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm
As already mentioned, on 26 and 27 November 2020 Mann J heard another CMC in the phone hacking case of Various Claimants v MGN Ltd. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm
On 23 July 2019 Mann J heard an application by the Claimants in the case of Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
Note that the judgment in another Mirror Hacking Litigation case, Winstone v MGN Ltd [2019] EWHC 265 (Ch) is now available on Bailii. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:03 pm
More recently, in Ferdinand v MGN Limited [2011] EWHC 2454 (QB) Nicol J said that a substantial body of the public would consider that the England football captain fell within Buxton LJ’s list of “those from whom higher standards were expected”. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
The ICO is seeking permission to appeal the ruling on Clearview AI Inc handed down by the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights) on 17 October 2023. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
On the same day Bean J heard the “offer of amends” case of KC v MGN Ltd – a claim by the natural father of “Baby P” wrongly accused in The People of being a sex offender convicted of raping a 14-year-old girl. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 29 January 2024, the consequentials hearing was heard following the judgment of The Duke of Sussex & Ors v MGN Ltd [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch), handed down on 15 December 2023. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
One concern the Daily Mirror had related to allegations that MGN’s legal department had been aware of widespread use of unlawful information gathering techniques. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
On 19 January 2015, Warby J heard applications in the case of Simpson v MGN. [read post]
