Search for: "MOTIVATION, INC." Results 241 - 260 of 5,098
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2023, 10:16 am by Mayme Beth Donohue
On July 13, 2023, the Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York issued the hotly anticipated ruling in the SEC’s case against Ripple Labs, Inc. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:11 pm by Patent Docs
During patent prosecution, rebutting an examiner's motivation to combine is often considered to be more difficult than rebutting a contention that the references teach one or more specific claim elements. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:32 am
Wachtell exploited a corporate client left unprotected by lame duck fiduciaries who had lost their motivation to act in Twitter’s best interest pending its imminent sale to Elon Musk and his entities, X Holdings I, Inc. and X Holdings II, Inc. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:32 am
Wachtell exploited a corporate client left unprotected by lame duck fiduciaries who had lost their motivation to act in Twitter’s best interest pending its imminent sale to Elon Musk and his entities, X Holdings I, Inc. and X Holdings II, Inc. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 12:51 am by Chris Manes
However, if state tax savings was the primary motivation, then the taxpayer has to seek another strategy, which basically comes down to changing residency. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 10:55 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today issued a precedential decision finding the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) erred in too narrowly confining its motivation-to-combine inquiry and improperly limiting its definition of the relevant art to hold that Axonics, Inc. had failed to prove Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 10:55 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today issued a precedential decision finding the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) erred in too narrowly confining its motivation-to-combine inquiry and improperly limiting its definition of the relevant art to hold that Axonics, Inc. had failed to prove Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:14 pm by Jon Brodkin
"Wachtell exploited a corporate client left unprotected by lame duck fiduciaries who had lost their motivation to act in Twitter's best interest pending its imminent sale to Elon Musk and his entities, X Holdings I, Inc. and X Holdings II, Inc. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 12:53 pm by The White Law Group
Brokers may be motivated by personal financial gain from these activities, which can compromise their ability to provide objective advice and recommendations. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am by Gene Takagi
President & Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
Legal Services Alabama, Inc., dealing with whether paid suspensions may be adverse employment actions under Title VII. [read post]