Search for: "MUELLER v. STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 878
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2019, 11:40 am
” A coalition of 13 U.S. states is suing the Trump administration over its new immigration policy, Reuters writes. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 3:31 am
Koh's court in the Northern District of California (this post continues below the document):19-08-15 Joint Case Managem... by Florian Mueller on ScribdThe next important date in this case is August 21. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 4:07 am
Supreme Court for argument time to support a challenge to New York City gun restrictions,” New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 5:35 am
In the United States, to implement such a system via constitutional amendment, the process laid out by Article V requires that two-thirds of both houses of Congress propose the amendment, or that the amendment arises from a convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:27 am
Corp. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Lawyers for Judiciary Committee Democrats described McGahn as both “critical” and the “most important fact witness” before the lawsuit was filed, noting he witnessed key obstruction episodes examined by special counsel Robert Mueller. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 9:04 am
We strongly oppose efforts by Republican lawmakers at the state and federal level to undermine Roe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 9:04 am
We strongly oppose efforts by Republican lawmakers at the state and federal level to undermine Roe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 4:07 am
Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak describes how self-described “jailhouse lawyer” Calvin Duncan shepherded Ramos v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
Motorola, Inc. and TCL v. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 2:48 am
Several of these states took a contrary position just months ago in Apple v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:39 pm
Moti... by Florian Mueller on ScribdThe motivation for this is not in the above motion, which instead states all sorts of largely or entirely pretextual reasons for the desired transfer from the Northern District of California (in this case, San Jose) to the Northern District of Texas (which practically means Dallas). [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:52 pm
Robart, affirmed by the Ninth Circuit), and Huawei v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
The Constitution states that members of Congress—along with every state legislative official and every judicial and executive official of both the state and federal governments—“shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 4:56 am
District Court for the Northern District of California decision to issue a preliminary injunction in East Bay Sanctuary et al. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 7:05 am
See Cascade Health Solutions v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:26 am
Hours later, President-Elect Trump tweeted, ‘Great move on delay (by V. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am
Jacques Singer-Emery and Patrick McDonnell assessed recent developments at the military commission in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:28 pm
But none of that makes Aspen an exclusive and extremely narrow path to the conclusion Judge Koh reached in FTC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 6:01 pm
And several Justices of the Supreme Court--sometimes even a majority--will, in at least some important cases (e.g., Trump v. [read post]
