Search for: "Madden v. Madden" Results 241 - 260 of 405
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2012, 4:55 am by Mark Methenitis
The Lanham Act arose in the gamespace during 2009’s James “Jim" Brown v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
On 4 October 2011 the Court of Justice duly delivered its ruling in Joined Cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm Chamberlain, Michael Madden, SR Leisure Ltd, Philip George Charles Houghton and Derek Owen and C-429/08 Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (see IPKat post here),  following which Mr Justice Kitchin -- having metaphorically vanished as… [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:53 am by CJLF Staff
Jerry Madden, chairman of the House Corrections Committee. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:34 pm by Ted Brooks
There are Undo and Redo annotations buttons, an Eraser to remove part of an annotation, and a Print (Adobe AirPrint) button.There is also a nice “Screen Lock” feature, which disables all of the file access options and allows you to  hand the iPad to a witness to use like a “John Madden” Telestratordevice (yup, just realized, there’s an app for that, football fans). [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 12:07 pm by igorodetski
Supreme Court heard arguments in the case Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:47 pm by David Lat
Lithwick begins by discussing the controversies brewing over calls for various justices to recuse themselves in Florida v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:51 am by Christopher Danzig
Court Awards Damages for Wrongful Disruption of Web Presence — Ordonez v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 2:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Madden is a case in which husband settles, and then sues wife's attorney for deceit.The deceit? [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Hughes, Jr., Book Note, Reviewing Bill Madden, Steinbrenner: The Last Lion of Baseball, 21 MARQUETTE SPORTS LAW REVIEW 801 (2011)Michelle R. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:18 am
Murphy, on the other hand, contended that he was eligible for appointment as a detective pursuant to the Code, citing Ryff v Safir, 264 AD2d 349, as authority for this claim. [read post]