Search for: "Maple v. Maple" Results 241 - 260 of 430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2008, 2:46 pm
The Ontario government, in addition to amending the Land Titles Act, also made submissions to the Ontario Court of Appeal in Lawrence v Maple Trust Co. (2007) 84 O.R. (3d) 94 ("Lawrence"). [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 4:30 pm by Robert Kreisman
” The appellate court stated that under the standard in the Pedrick case and Maple v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm by John Elwood
And indeed, Smith likens his case to Maples. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
Richard Clark and Curtis Cusinato - Despite the uncertainty and volatility continuing to affect both the global economy and North American capital markets, controlled auction transactions in the Canadian marketplace remain remarkably active, especially in the mid-market. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 5:10 am by cdw
Maples, a death row inmate in Alabama, his life. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:07 am by Beck, et al.
In Goodridge v Pfizer Canada Inc., 2010 ONSC 1095 (Feb. 18, 2010), the plaintiffs claimed injuries from off-label use of Neurontin and its generic version. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 6:51 am by CMS
Referring to the “sensible, fair and practicable dividing line” that was laid down in the case of Allied Maples Group Ltd v Simmons & Simmons (a firm) [1995] 1 WLR 1602, the court noted that: “… the courts have developed a clear and common-sense dividing line between those matters which the client must prove, and those which may better be assessed upon the basis of the evaluation of a lost chance. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:41 am by George M. Wallace
You will recall, perhaps, that I am a defendant in The Litigation Commonly Known as Rakofsky v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:05 pm
In summarising the general principles applicable to inquiries as to damages, the judge drew attention to Allied Maples Group v Simmons & Simmons [1995] WLR 1602, and following authorities, on loss of chance. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
On April 1, 2015, the Court of Appeals decided the case of Maple Drive Farms Limited Partnership, et al., v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 10:49 am by Viking
Argument date | case number | case name | summary of QP. 10.04 10-63 Maples v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 5:16 am
His most recent IP Opinions have involved the conflict between trade mark law and other rights: protected national emblems were at issue in the 'battle of the maple leaves' in Joined Cases Câ€'202/08 P and Câ€'208/08 P American Clothing Associates SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market and Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market v American Clothing Associates SA, while in Joined Cases T-225/06, T-255/06,… [read post]