Search for: "Mark B Rogers" Results 241 - 260 of 424
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2021, 2:05 am by Matt Gilley, FordHarrison
 You’ll notice that an incredible number of my sentences end in question marks. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The list is in alphabetical order, with the top of the list being tags that were originally written with quotation marks. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:19 am
Quattrocchi (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) TTAB finds SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION merely descriptive of marketing services (TTABlog) Trademark holder not entitled to domain name registered years before: National Arbitration Forum decision in Arizona State Trailer Sales, Inc. d/b/a Little Dealer Little Prices RV v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 6:29 am
Rogers deploys the anecdote to introduce the critical point that innovation is largely a social process, and we ignore the structural barriers to innovation at our peril. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Techdirt), A day in the life of an IP blog – WIPO magazine article about the blogging life of Jeremy Phillips: (Patent Baristas) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Droste effect packaging: (box vox), (Class 46), Against cyberproperty (and cybertrespass): (The Trademark Blog), Fabergé egg flip – Article on Fabergé  brand and protection strategy: (Afro-IP), Domain name tasting proposal passed by… [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 6:19 am
"Section B of this amendment is vague, undefined and it's ambiguous," Blomquist said. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Section 2 registration bars (public morals, public order, dignity/personality interests); remedies (disgorgement and injunctions both incorporate public interest considerations); cancellation (actions can be brought by anyone who thinks they may be damaged, even if dignitary interests of goats on a roof aren’t cognizable); dilution by tarnishment; post-sale confusion; infringement defenses (nominative fair use and Rogers invoke public interest in discourse, though positioned as a… [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  (RT: I could hardly disagree more about what Rogers is/should be.) [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
But, caveat, compare Booking.com where the Court seems to think that TM has no normative components, it’s all empirical about what is functioning as a mark: the limit case is when TM owners convince 15% of consumers that any reference to them at all requires permission and so there’s at least a 43(a) violation in any unauthorized reference—the Court seemed unwilling to deal with that scenario, which fits the facts of a number of the Rogers cases it distinguished… [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Malpractice and Tort Law Marc Ginsberg, The John Marshall Law School (Chicago), Cross-Disciplinary Expert Testimony In Medical Negligence Litigation Mark Hall, Wake Forest University, The Restatement (Third) of Medical Liability Michelle Mello, Stanford University, Practice Changes Among Medical Malpractice "Frequent Flyers" Alix Rogers, Stanford Law School, Neither Property Nor Tort: The Curious Case of Quasi-Property of Human Bodily Remains D. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am by Florian Mueller
Given the importance of this subject, I'll now republish an open letter that 77 former government officials and professors (of law, economics, and business) have sent Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim in order to remind him of long-standing and consistent U.S. policies on standard-essential patents (SEP) under both Republican and Democratic administrations. [read post]