Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 241 - 260
of 70,504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
Sky v Skykick [2018] EWHC 155 (Ch) told us that this required the global assessment so beloved of the Court of Justice, taking into account all the circumstances of the case. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:50 am
In this case, the infringement was exactly about the use of a disclaimed feature. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 8:50 am
More details of the case after the jump. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:59 am
Mostert, "Famous and Well-Known Marks: An International Analysis" (1997)).But the Supreme Court neither further analyzes Mostert's assertion nor explains why it, and not the approach taken in Person's case, should apply to the case at hand. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 3:19 pm
Feit Electric Company, Inc., Case No. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 8:30 am
In this latter case the level of attention is in most cases high. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 1:59 am
In the present case, CL relied upon the findings in Bloomberg. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 3:03 pm
The firm takes most cases of this type on a contingency fee basis and advance the case costs, and only gets paid for their fees and costs out of money recovered for clients. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 7:44 am
First things first, a little background on the case. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 11:43 am
Adding to the increasingly abundant case law on unconventional EU trade marks (EUTMs), in the following decision (Case R 197/2021-5) from August this year, the EUIPO Fifth Board of Appeal found that the position mark below, comprising of a tread and outer portion of a tyre in light grey, could not be registered as an EUTM for goods in class 12 due to lack of distinctive character:The mark applied for was described as follows: “The trade… [read post]
26 May 2007, 4:23 pm
The June 2007 issue of Sweet & Maxwell's European Trade Mark Reports - published ahead of its cover date as usual - carries a fascinating selection of cases. [read post]
European Union Trademarks and Austria: Famous mark PUMA beats “PUMA Multipower” for dissimilar goods
1 Jul 2023, 2:36 am
Background of the case In a recent opposition case, the Higher Regional Court Vienna (“HRC), had the rare opportunity to shed some light on the scope of protection of the well-known trademark “PUMA” as against a similar mark applied for entirely dissimilar goods (decision of 22.03.2023, case 33 R 80/22k). [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 12:21 am
Third, the new Article 32 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law has codified the common practice in trade secret cases with respect of shifting the burden of proof. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am
In this Smith case, Judge Mark found that there was only an argument that the specific condition which allegedly caused the injury at issue had allegedly occurred generally in the past. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 5:02 am
Is Article 21(1)(a) of Regulation ... 874/2004 to be interpreted as meaning that a legitimate interest exists only in the cases mentioned in Article 21(2)(a) to (c)? [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
In any case, the sign is distinctive. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 2:02 pm
Free case evaluation. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:51 am
These bodies might also be responsible, such as is the case is for the Italian Agenzia per l’Italia Digitale (AgID), for establishing, maintaining and publishing national trusted lists that include information related to qualified trust service providers and related services. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:58 am
The court denied defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's false marking claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on an earlier-filed case involving the same claims. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
Cir. 2005)] and subsequent Federal Circuit case law. . . . [read post]
