Search for: "Mark Toy"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2015, 6:28 am
US, a recent decision of the Court of International Trade.The issue in this case is whether wearing apparel from China bearing the brand-name "C'est Toi Jeans Los Angeles," "CT Jeans USA," and "C'est Toi Jeans USA" were properly the subject of a Notice to Mark or Redeliver for failure to have adequate country of origin marking. [read post]
8 May 2023, 7:10 am
Unsurprisingly, the Board dismissed Professor Rebecca Curtin's opposition to registration of the mark RAPUNZEL for dolls and toy figures, finding that Curtin, as a mere consumer of fairytale-themed products, failed to prove her entitlement to a statutory cause of action. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:42 am
It held that VIP’s First Amendment interest in using Jack Daniel’s trademarks as its own marks on funny dog toys conferred special protection from infringement claims. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:00 am
For example, the PTO should require the owner of “TOYS.COM” (if it has acquired distinctiveness and is otherwise protectable) to disclaim any right to use “TOYS” or “.COM” apart from the proposed mark as shown. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:21 am
Such trademarks and service marks have gained a high level of recognition with the public. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:15 am
CJ offered many different sized plush pillow toys that didn’t bear a striking resemblance to its products. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:28 pm
” Infringement has the potential to not only dilute the value of a mark, but also to negatively impact a mark owner’s underlying business. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm
Jack Daniel’s argues that the Ninth Circuit’s ruling places a potential infringer’s free-speech rights above those of a trademark holder, and that this protection will give “copycats free license to prey on unsuspecting consumers and mark holders. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm
Jack Daniel’s argues that the Ninth Circuit’s ruling places a potential infringer’s free-speech rights above those of a trademark holder, and that this protection will give “copycats free license to prey on unsuspecting consumers and mark holders. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:47 am
The Board dismissed this Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark SUN BUM for stickers, clothing, and toy animals, because Opposer Donald A. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:09 pm
Toys "R" Us, Inc., No. 08-17021 (11th Cir. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 10:43 am
If you really believed what you are insisting, you wouldn't be insisting, you'd be, perhaps, entertaining a suggestion or toying with a notion or musing about the possibility, now wouldn't you? [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 9:51 am
VIP’s “Bad Spaniels” chewable dog toy. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 4:01 am
., Cancellation No. 92025859 [Petition for cancellation (filed in January 1997) of two registrations for the mark COHIBA (one in standard form, the other stylized) for "cigars," on the grounds of violation of Article 8 of the Pan-American Convention, likelihood of confusion with Petitioner's identical mark for cigars, fraud in filing a Section 15 Declaration, misuse of a registration under Section 14(3), and abandonment.]February 3, 2022 - 2 PM: In re Artsana S.p.A.,… [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 11:00 pm
Evidence of third-party use of various teddy bear designs (some wearing duffle coats and hats or hoods) for stuffed toys, in books, and in a calendar, bolstered the majority's conclusion:Such evidence demonstrates that teddy bears are indeed ubiquitous in the children's toy market, and that teddy bears obviously co-exist and are distinguished because of the differences in the teddy bears themselves and/or other terms used in conjunction with teddy bears. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:41 pm
Apple has exclusive rights to use the LIGHTNING mark in connection with such things as eyeglasses, eyeglass frames, goggles, audio and video equipment, recorded computer software, electric signs, toy vehicles, pinball machines, computer game programs, and “games and playthings” in general. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 4:29 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark CAT & CO., in both standard character and design form (shown below), finding the phrase merely descriptive of cat litter, cat beds, cat toys, and cat food [CAT disclaimed]. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 8:44 am
Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot commented on the EUIPO Board of Appeal’s ruling that the owner of trade mark for rabbit-like character called Miffy could oppose registration of a similar mark for sex toys due to tarnishment of reputation. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 11:03 am
VIP Products has made a dog toy called “Bad Spaniels. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:30 am
The case of Simba Toys GmbH & Co. [read post]
