Search for: "Market Advantage, Ltd."
Results 241 - 260
of 565
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
In Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy, the CJEU stated that use that does not create an impression of commercial connection or take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s distinctive character or repute will be considered honest practice. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 3:43 am
It is, therefore, a small producer and enjoys a small part of the UK market. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:20 am
LTD v Franklin County Board of Revision (Case Nos. 2014-1120, 2014-1121). [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
You would need to register this content within three months of publication to take advantage of statutory damages. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 4:02 pm
In 2012, CPAA’s efforts were bolstered when the Financial Markets Authority accredited CPAA to license auditors. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
* Cool, confident and healthyNicola the Katonomist demonstrates her mastery of wearable keep-fit technology and the struggle of Jawbone, Fitbit and others to seize control of this lucrative, patent-rich market. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:45 am
Bake Off parody goes off-airThe Sound of Music has now been silenced, as copyright owners object to BBC's marketing parody. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:10 am
Moroccanoil … but no fishy oil forfeit The Moroccanoil case (Moroccanoil Israel Ltd v Aldi Stores Ltd[2014] EWHC 1686 (IPEC)), by contrast, shows the weaknesses of English law when a brand owner doesn’t plan ahead and finds itself without any registered trade marks to rely upon. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:59 pm
I’ll be full time with Tessa and Graeme building up Easy Law Training Ltd. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 5:14 am
FCE (Pty) Ltd did not wish to transfer use of the domain as it would be detrimental to its business communication (because its email addresses included the domain (@fairhavenestate.co.za) and affect its marketing campaign which centred around the domain. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 11:03 pm
Morris certainly understood and took advantage of the enormous power imbalance between him and Silvera. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 11:03 pm
Morris certainly understood and took advantage of the enormous power imbalance between him and Silvera. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
If an attorney or law firm has procured clients through marketing efforts that run afoul of the barratry statute, it would be in its interest to have the issued resolved in a private forum, and not create a public record, but does that advance the state's public policy? [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 7:24 am
Those issues require fact discovery into areas such as the internal efforts by the manufacturers to develop and sell the device, marketing and sales practices, and the FDA regulatory approval and monitoring process. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:15 am
| OHIM’s rebranding | LV’s pattern as trade mark | EPO and trade unions | Patent and first-mover advantage | Libraries’ right to digitise their collection in Germany. [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:38 am
Krka and Consilient were therefore deprived of their "first mover" advantage. [read post]
20 May 2015, 11:02 am
Luke’s Health Sys., Ltd., No. 14-35173 (9th Cir. [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:18 am
They had different distribution channels and purposes, they belonged to separate market sectors so that they were neither interchangeable nor in competition, all of which ruled out the closeness between the goods and services concerned.In conclusion, the General Court stopped Swatch’s time for revenge without assessing the existence of the risks contained in Article 8(5), insofar as it had already excluded the necessary connection between its well known marks and the contested… [read post]
