Search for: "Marketing King, Inc."
Results 241 - 260
of 881
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2017, 4:29 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:00 am
Hartley & Ors v King Edward VI College, heard 1 February 2017. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
Hartley & Ors v King Edward VI College, heard 1 February 2017. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm
The Competition and Markets Authority are also to investigate the bid. [read post]
11 Mar 2017, 9:33 am
Healthy items (see recall notice for details) City Market I.M. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Come to UCL IBIL's copyright panel on Wednesday | After Sweden and Germany, GS Media finds its application in the Czech RepublicNever Too Late 134 [week ending on Sunday 5 February] | Around the IP Blogs | King Tut's tomb: conservation or replication (but don't forget the "aura")? [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
Internet and Social Media The Swedish Patent and Market Court of Appeal has ordered The Pirate Bay and Swefilmer to be blocked. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
Shell Oil Company, et al., No. 16-713 BPCIA – Notice of Commercial Marketing: Apotex Inc., et al. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 2:47 pm
The likelihood of state statutory or regulatory restrictions on insured arrangements is particularly likely because of the heavy regulation of these products by states including the widespread incorporation of ACA mandates into state insurance laws and regulations in response to the Market Reform provisions of the ACA. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm
King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., et al., No. 15-1055 (antitrust reverse payment – appeal from the 3rd Cir.) [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm
Google, Facebook Inc. and other Internet companies will be covered by strict new European Union privacy rules that seek to limit access to consumers’ data. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:02 am
Frito-Lay, Inc. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 4:02 pm
King v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
R. 50 JMOL motion) BPCIA – Notice of Commercial Marketing: Apotex Inc., et al. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am
King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., et al., No. 15-1055 (antitrust reverse payment – appeal from the 3rd Cir.) 3. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 3:34 am
Other surcharges were sought for use of corporate funds to pay the decedent’s and the estate’s legal fees in the proceeding, and for the difference in value between the building’s alleged fair market value over $4 million and its “depressed” $3.5 million sale price due to a below-market commercial lease granted by the decedent encumbering the building’s first floor. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 11:44 am
In another similar case involving a drug manufacturer, a former sales representative of Pfizer, Inc., brought a qui tam lawsuit, alleging the manufacturer engaged in off-label marketing of its painkiller, Bextra. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 11:44 am
In another similar case involving a drug manufacturer, a former sales representative of Pfizer, Inc., brought a qui tam lawsuit, alleging the manufacturer engaged in off-label marketing of its painkiller, Bextra. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
See Ultramercial, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 11:22 am
by Sharon Nelson, Sensei Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
