Search for: "Marks v. Howe"
Results 241 - 260
of 14,199
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
” This is precisely what the Supreme Court called for in TSC Industries v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
Bakshi v Hosseinzadeh (2017 ONCA 838) marks the seminal case which questions whether property transferred as Mahr, should be excluded pursuant to section 4(2) of the FLA or whether it should be included in the parties’ Net Family Property (NFP) for purposes of the equalization calculation. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
Bakshi v Hosseinzadeh (2017 ONCA 838) marks the seminal case which questions whether property transferred as Mahr, should be excluded pursuant to section 4(2) of the FLA or whether it should be included in the parties’ Net Family Property (NFP) for purposes of the equalization calculation. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
The volume brings together contributions from academics, musicologists, and lawyers to offer some answers to the question, “how can the law better align with the expectations of musicians with the structures of copyright? [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:16 am
Channel Fabrics, Inc. v Skwiersky, Alpert & Bressler LLP 2023 NY Slip Op 06471 [222 AD3d 512] December 19, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department illustrates the varying levels of service that accountants provide, and how the all important accountant’s retainer agreement can limit liability. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:04 am
How do you think these three came out? [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
” Those words from the Supreme Court in its Trump v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
The fact that Sir Mark had been buried at Sledmere in a sealed lead coffin raised the likelihood of better samples being found for the petitioner’s research. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am
” While there’s no reason Section 230 couldn’t apply to digital items sold by the defendant, I don’t see how 230 can apply equally to offline physical items. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:20 am
In so doing, the Epilogue discusses the case, Murray v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Here are a few preliminary thoughts about the Court’s decision yesterday in Trump v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:19 am
All nine justices were able to agree on a bottom-line result in Trump v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
See NLRB v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm
From Honeyfund.com inc v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Pix credit here The majority’s choice of a different path leaves the remaining Justices with a choice of how to respond. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
It is also difficult to see how the act of affixing a sign in itself affects or is liable to affect a trade mark function or constitutes communication to the public (as required for the concept of 'use'). [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Travis Laster held in Palkon v. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 1:04 pm
" Hughes, 506 Mich at 539 (quotation marks and citation omitted). [read post]