Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 241 - 260
of 21,452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2013, 7:43 am
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court recently decided State of Maine v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
It will be difficult for a Cuban trade mark applicant who lives in the United States and who travels around to avoid being found to be a bad faith trade mark applicant, being a person with previous knowledge of all those trade marks. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 2:16 am
Lutz Superdyne, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:39 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 07-1603 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, Death Warrant Signed v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 8:33 am
Patent Compliance Group, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:20 pm
This morning, the Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 12:28 am
Brunetti and the opinion of the AG Bobek in Constantin Film Produktion v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:14 pm
In truth, though, for slogan marks the public’s perception is not the same as for other types of marks and, therefore, assessing their distinctiveness results more difficult.In the light of Audi v OHIM the General Court addressed some typical issues affecting slogan marks. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 2:48 pm
See Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 2:04 pm
At least one false marking plaintiff is following the lead of the most prolific false marking plaintiff, Thomas Simonian, by borrowing, word for word, the additional paragraph Mr. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:00 am
On August 31, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Stauffer v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 8:27 am
Pequignot v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:49 am
John Bean Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:33 pm
John's Law Review Symposium: 40th Anniversary of Plyler v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 3:01 am
Another factor is the question of what would become of such property (including trade marks) once forfeited to the State. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:16 am
The district court agreed because there had been no "injury-in-fact" to the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:37 pm
Just answerin’—and in only two words: Presidential Immunity (see Nixon v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 11:46 am
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:34 am
Haley, Judge Richard Mark Gergel held that South Carolina's same-sex marriage bans (by statute and state constitutional amendment) is... [read post]
