Search for: "Marks v. United States of America"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,665
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
United States Postal Service, the court held 6-3 that the government is not a “person” who can challenge the validity of a patent under the America Invents Act. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
Case date: 17 March 2021 Case number: No. 19-2316 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 12:56 pm
Petro-Suisse LTD. and Mark GasarchCase number: 12-cv-6221 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: August 14, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: September 25, 2013 10/22/2013 01/20/2014 2013-97 Brian G. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 10:40 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
If the battle to root out racial prejudice in capital cases is ever to be won, it will require that we not turn a blind eye to cases like Warren King’s.That case also offers the Court a chance to send a clear message about the seriousness with which it takes violations of its 1986 Batson v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm
On June 26, 2013, when the Supreme Court decided the case of United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 5:59 am
” Applicant focused on the rarity of the surname, arguing that “because there are only five people in the entire United States with the surname Belushi, substantially no one will be adversely affected by the registration of Applicant’s mark BELUSHI’S. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
It also suggests the extent of the uniqueness of the premises that mark the boundaries of judicial power and their role in government and with law. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:08 am
Thanks to District Court Judge Joan Ericksen of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, next week NeoCon attendees will be able to see and experience both SEEYOND and BEYOND products, without likely confusion, when she confirmed last week in a written order her previous oral denial of the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order in Verscene Inc. and Seeyond Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:52 pm
" That's how Assistant United States Attorney Molissa Farber characterized the Ancient Coin Collectors Guild's (ACCG) latest argument before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in the Baltimore test case.Both the ACCG and federal government offered oral arguments to the appeals court on March 22, marking the case's ninth year winding through the court system.Listen to the arguments presented in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 3:29 pm
Well, not as such, says Merpel, who has read the recent WIPO media release "United States of America, Japan Join International Design System" with interest and some uncertainty as to what it all means. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Moving to Latin America, the floor was taken by Barbarita Guzmán, who focused on interaction between trade marks and copyright -- also considering the ‘moral rights’ issue in Bolivia, Colombia, Peru, and Ecuador. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 3:42 pm
Code §1201 - KidnappingUnited States of America v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 3:42 pm
Code §1201 - KidnappingUnited States of America v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
United States, in which the justices held that a defendant who pleads guilty in a plea deal can benefit from later changes in the sentencing guidelines so long as the district court relied on the guideline range in imposing the sentence or accepting the agreement. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 2:45 pm
(PCPM) has once again been recognized on the Best Lawyers in America list for 2021, marking his twenty-seventh consecutive year on the prestigious list. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 3:18 am
The state of affairs in the first Apple v. [read post]
